New Yalta sum up

Yalta Agreement indicated the end of Nazi Plan and Nazi occupation of Europe. NWO's vicious cabal are Nazis continuators. They want to rule Europe and the world and establish a European and Global Dictatorship. A New Yalta Agreement is necessary. It will indicate the end of NWO's ridiculous plan and EU occupation of Europe. Big Four should manage the Agreement process.

China, USA, India, Russia have 48% of world's GDP (Appendix 17), while the fifty largest have 96%. These four are also strongest militarily, in a different order, USA, Russia, China, India. The countries that support NWO's ridiculous plan and EU should be excluded from the Agreement. Otherwise, if they are included, it would be like having the Nazis participate in the Yalta Conference.

There are one hundred and ninety five (or seven) countries in the world. The forty largest economies have 93% of world's GDP. In the top forty countries, there are eleven that are probably in the wrong direction; Germany, France, UK, Italy, Turkiye, Spain, Canada, Poland, Netherlands, Romania, Belgium. They have 18% of world's GDP. Some of them could change their direction.

AntiNWO's plans were designed to be winning positions. They have huge support all over the world, compared to NWO's ridiculous plan. The only exception is EU occupied territory. NWO is a Western European creation. Europe's contamination with NWO virus is big. NWO has many puppet governments in Europe that serve NWO's goals instead of serving the people that voted for them.

In the future, NWO puppet governments will be replaced with AntiNWO governments. The new governments will approve the Agreement and implement it but they will not have the chance to shape it. The Agreement can't wait the replacement of NWO's puppet governments. In terms of the involvement in the process, there are four categories of countries; a) manage the process b) involved directly c) excluded d) involved indirectly.

All the countries that support NWO's ridiculous plan and EU will be excluded from the process. They are a big anomaly in the world, misaligned. Most of them are in EU occupied territory but some are not, like Turkiye and Canada. The minimum number of countries involved directly are four, the Big Four. The maximum is all the countries in the world, one hundred and ninety five (or seven).

The more countries get involved directly, the more support New Yalta Agreement will get. But involving directly all the countries in the world would make the process extremely complex and slow, impossible to get results. If Big Four want to get the largest possible support, they should involve directly the largest number of countries they can handle.

Although this would be feasible, it would still be very complex and require a lot of time. If Big Four want to reduce complexity and time required, they should reduce the number of countries directly involved. That approach balances support and time needed. It will not get the maximum possible support but it will save a lot of time. Involving directly G50 would probably get the maximum support.

Below G50, there is only 4% of the world's GDP so it would not add much more, if these countries are directly involved. If G40 are directly involved, Big Four will have to deal with twenty five countries, since the eleven black sheep will be excluded. If G20 are directly involved, Big Four will have to deal with only eight countries, excluding the world's black sheep.

Another approach would be to set a target, for instance 67%. G4 would involve directly some countries and make changes in the Agreement till they reach 67% support. When this happens, they make the Agreement final and seek further support from the countries below. G4 should be able to reach 67% support in G30. If they want to take some risk, they can finalize the Agreement before hitting the target and estimate to get the remaining support needed for the target from the countries below.

Rounds could be the fastest approach. Big Four will make an Agreement without involving any other countries. They will try it with fifty or more countries. If it hits the target they have set, they make it final. If not, they make changes and go for another round. They repeat rounds until target is reached. Since the number of countries involved is the minimum, it could be the fastest approach, if the rounds required are not many.

The world has eight billion people. It is helpful to have four countries manage the process. They should have some type of division into four. They could divide the countries directly involved into four and each one deal with one quarter. Or they could divide the world into four parts with two billion people in every part. In Eastern Asia, there are four billion people. So two parts could be there. China and India could deal with these.

The countries that manage the process could be eight, sixteen, thirty two and so on. The more they are, the more complex it becomes, more lengthy in time and more difficult to get results. Instead, Big Four could involve countries in steps, according to the order in the list with the largest economies. In the first step, they could involve the four countries that follow (5 - 8), in the second the next four (9 - 12) and so on. All the black sheep will be excluded.

For the countries that are not involved directly, it will be a "take it or leave it" approach. Either they approve or disapprove the Agreement. Nevertheless, they could be involved indirectly, through one or more of G4. They should contact them and express their preferences. Big Four could try to satisfy their desires to the extend possible but this would be optional.

It should be clear to all countries that there are only two alternatives; a) New Yalta Agreement b) NWO's ridiculous plan. So all these that do not like NWO's disastrous plan should support New Yalta Agreement. Nevertheless, there will be neutral countries. In the end, not only the support for New Yalta Agreement should matter but also the support for NWO's big failure.

Percentages should be calculated, for the support the two plans have, among the countries that are not neutral, support one or the other. Although neutral countries should be minimized, they may have already given the victory to New Yalta Agreement. If neutral countries have more than 4% of GDP, less than 96% remains. Big Four have already 48% which is more than half. The effort is to make the victory as big as possible.

It is EXTREMELY CRUCIAL that EU CEASES to EXIST. EU is NWO, they are the same. EU and Europe should be divided in at least two parts with Russia included. These were some important points but not all of them could fit in a summary. In the previous articles about New Yalta Agreement, there are additional important points and detailed explanation. So although a summary is very helpful, all those interested in the subject should read once or again these articles.

New Yalta process   New Yalta process 2   New Yalta process 3   Target, risk, rounds   Time vs support   New Yalta process example   New Yalta process example 2   New Yalta elaboration