Stop fighting in Ukraine

Stop fighting in Ukraine

There was a European Political Community summit in Tirana, Albania. The main topic was the war in Ukraine. We stated that they should discuss how EU and Europe will be divided because it is the only meaningful topic. Isn't the war in Ukraine an important issue? Of course it is very important but it has to be seen in the context of dividing Europe in two (or more) groups. This has to be addressed first.

The cause of the war in Ukraine is NWO's plan. According to this silly plan, all Eastern Europe will be in European Union while Russia and Belarus will be in Asian Union. All countries that get in EU become NATO members as well, based on NWO's twisted and chaotic thinking. Ukraine, Russia and Belarus had always been the closest allies.

Pro - Russia Party of Regions was the largest in Ukraine from 2006 til 2014. It was very strong in eastern and southern Ukraine. This part of the country is very friendly towards Russia. Yanukovych is from Donetsk Oblast (province) in eastern Ukraine. He served as a governor there from 1997 til 2002. From 2002 to 2007 he was prime minister many times.

In 2004, he won the presidential elections. Because Yanukovych was pro - Russian, Western European NWO orchestrated Orange Revolution and replaced him with Yushchenko. In February 2010 he won presidential elections again and this time Western European NWO was not able to overthrow him. But they did later. In November 2013, he did not sign an association agreement with EU.

Western European NWO orchestrated Maidan Revolution or Revolution of Dignity, a wave of riots and overthrew the legally elected President. Russia annexed Crimea in February 2014. There were demonstrations in the pro - Russian eastern and southern parts of Ukraine. Also pro - Russian armed rebels gained control of Donetsk and Luhansk regions.

In June 2014, Poroshenko became President. He had collaborated very closely with Western European NWO in orchestrating Revolution of Dignity. In 2019, Western European NWO placed Zelensky as president. His assignment was to implement NWO's plan, turn Ukraine against its former close allies (Russia, Belarus) and attach it to Western Europe and EU. Part of the assignment was ethnic cleansing in pro - Russia provinces.

The cause of the war in Ukraine is NWO's plan and EU. In order for the war to end, NWO's plan and EU must cease to exist. It is meaningless to talk about the war in Ukraine in European Political Community summit, unless first the division of Europe in at least two parts is agreed. This must happen first and then the war in Ukraine will stop.

Is it bad if Russia and Ukraine have direct talks? No, it is not bad. It is something very positive but it is really doubtful that there will be any formal agreement. Russia will not give away any territory it gained. There have been hundreds of thousands killed or wounded and huge financial cost on both sides. Russia did not get into all this messy and bloody situation, just to give up territory that was gained with so high cost, in human lives and economic.

On the other hand, Ukrainians will not sign away land that was theirs a few years ago. It is extremely difficult to come to a formal agreement. Does this mean that the war will go on for ever? No, the war can stop any day. No formal agreement is required in order to stop the fighting. After war talks can go on for years or decades. As the situation is right now, it is Ukraine's benefit to stop fighting because Russian army is advancing.

In order to stop fighting, there must be a plan for the future. Obviously NWO's plan is out of the question. EU must cease to exist. Ukraine's and Middle East's conflicts must be seen in the broader context of New Yalta Agreement. AntiNWO has a great future for all Eastern European Group which includes Ukraine. AntiNWO is using "out of sight out of mind" approach.

Fighting and conflicting countries will be separated to the extent possible. Israel will be placed in a different Group than Arab and Muslim countries. Most likely Israel will be placed in Eastern European Group because it is the closest non Muslim Group. Ukraine can't be placed in a different Group than Russia but it will placed in a different Subgroup, as it has been explained in the article "Ukraine's placement" and shown in Table B of Appendix 11.

Ukraine will be placed in the same Region with German Wannabes, Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia). In Table C, Israel is not included in Region A2. Czechia has to be added to the Region in order to have roughly equal populations. The most likely scenario is that of Table B. Region A2 includes Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries plus Israel.

Ukraine's closer relations will be in Region A1 with German Wannabes. These were among the biggest supporters of Ukraine during the war. At a second level, Region A1 will develop relations with Region A2 in Subgroup A. All countries in Region A1 (not counting Ukraine) and many in Region A2 are in EU. So Ukraine will be dealing with mainly ex - EU countries. Subgroup A will be mostly a spin off from EU.

At a third level, Subgroup A will develop relations with Subgroup B be which is Commonwealth of Independent States. Although Ukraine will be in the same Group with Russia, they will not have close relations. Alternatively, in Eastern European Group, Italy could participate instead of German Wannabes and Turkiye instead of Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan) and Azerbaijan. According to the approach "out of sight out of mind", Turkiye must be in a different Group than Greece. 

Europe's division in at least two parts will be in New Yalta Agreement which will not only have grouping for Europe but for the whole world. Zelensky wanted to meet with Putin. Even if this happened, something not very likely, obviously they could not decide regarding New Yalta Agreement. Not even the Big Four (China, USA, India, Russia) could decide on their own.

They would also need support from other countries, as it has been explained in several articles regarding New Yalta Agreement. Nevertheless, Trump and Putin could make a preliminary agreement after they consult with China and India. The New Yalta Agreement will be final after it gets adequate support. More than 51% of world's GDP could be adequate but the more it gets, the stronger it would be.

Suppose Putin and Zelensky met in Istanbul. They would only agree that they disagree in most points. Meetings at a lower level could be useful because they could identify a few points of agreement and clarify the many points of disagreement. It will make the picture much clearer in both countries, regarding the other side's view. Although these meetings will be useful, it is not expected that they will lead to a formal agreement, which seems very difficult.

But the war can end any day if the two sides just stop fighting. For that to happen, the broad guidelines of New Yalta Agreement have to be drawn. Discussing the details will take a very long time but the details are not necessary for the fighting to stop. So the order is a) New Yalta Agreement broad guidelines b) stop war c) discuss details. That is why the only meaningful topic is how to divide EU and Europe in at least two parts.

Ukraine’s deception and solution   West-NATO deception   New Yalta process   New Yalta process example   New Yalta elaboration   Target, risk, rounds   Time vs support   Agreement on global plan

Scroll to Top