Target, risk, rounds

Regarding the New Yalta Agreement process, we need to make some clarifications. There would be four stages; a) preparatory b) agreement c) support d) implementation. During the second stage, the agreement will be final. In the third stage, Real G4 will seek further support, from the countries that are below the suggested percentage of world's GDP needed to make it final, 67%.

The number that will matter is the percentage of world's GDP that in the end will support the Agreement. In politics and in other fields, majority(50%+) and two thirds (67%) are the most common percentages used. Majority is more than half. If a Parliament has 300 members, majority is 151 members. Although majority is enough, two thirds is considered a very strong support for something that must be decided.

If the New Yalta Agreement has 67% or more of the world's GDP that supports it, nobody would dare to dispute it. Real G4 should get that percentage for a very simple reason. Just the four of them, have 48% of the world's GDP. So they need 19% (48 + 19 = 67) more from the remaining 52% (100 - 48 = 52) which is a little more than a third (19 / 52 = 0,365). Real G4 should be able to get roughly one third of the remaining GDP.

We suggested that the Agreement should be final when it gets 67% of the world's GDP to support it. This is an extremely cautious approach that has zero risk. If we accept that the minimum percentage to make the Agreement strong is 67%, the extremely cautious approach that has zero risk is to finalize the Agreement only when this percentage is reached.

In the support stage, the Agreement will get more support from the rest of the countries and the percentage of world's GDP will increase. But we do not know how much the increase would be. Suppose that Real G4 take a decision without involving any other countries and make it final. Then, they try to get support from the rest of the countries. They start with 48% of the world's GDP. Probably they will reach 67% but it is not certain.

Suppose that Real G4 make the Agreement final when it reaches 55% of the world's GDP. In that case, the chances to reach 67% are bigger, compared to if they started with 48%. There is some risk involved that they may not reach 67%, if they do not have that support when they make the Agreement final. The smaller the difference of the percentage they have to the target, the smaller the probability they will not reach it.

When they have reached the target, the difference is zero and the risk of not reaching that percentage is zero. Nevertheless, they could take some risk because the cost is not that big. Suppose that Real G4 decide without involving any other countries. Then, they seek support for the Agreement, without giving the option to make changes. It will be take it or leave it. Countries would either support it or not support it.

Still it could reach 67%. What if they get only 60%? Well, 60% is still good but it is customary to consider two thirds a very strong support. So if they want to have at least 67% support, they would have to go back, make changes and seek support again. So the risk they would be taking is to start all over again if they need to reach a certain percentage of the world's GDP.

Since Real G4 will manage the process, they will have to set the minimum acceptable percentage of world's GDP that should support the Agreement. Then, they will have to determine the level of the risk they want to take in reaching that goal. If they feel lucky, they could make the agreement without involving any other countries and try to reach the desired percentage without making any changes.

If they want to be safe, they should make modifications to the preliminary agreement in order to reach the target and then seek further support to surpass that goal. They could also use rounds. They would agree on a preliminary Agreement and then try it with many countries. Instead of dealing with only G30, they will run it through fifty (50), seventy five (75) or one hundred (100) countries.

If they see that it reaches the target they have set, they leave it as it is. If it does not reach the percentage of the world's GDP they want, they change it and try to see how the modified Agreement does in the second round. This can be continued until they reach the target they have set. It may take, one, two, three, four or even more rounds to succeed.

In the process explained in previous articles, Real G4 work with Real G30 and make modifications until it reaches the target, 67% (or something else). Then they seek more support from the rest of the countries below G30. This is the zero risk approach. In the approach that has some risk, they reach a percentage lower than the target set and hope to get the remaining in the support stage.

In the rounds approach, they make a preliminary agreement and try it with many countries without making any changes to find out what percentage it could reach. If the desired target is reached, they leave it as it is. if not, they modify the Agreement and go for another round with many countries, to see the response that it will get the second time. They continue the rounds until the target is reached.

In the rounds approach, it is not necessary to run the Agreement through all the countries in the world. The twenty largest economies have almost 80% of the world's GDP. Probably after the hundred largest, there will be not much of the world's GDP left for the remaining. One hundred countries are roughly half the countries in the world. Nevertheless, their total GDP is probably a very small percentage of the world's GDP.

So there are different ways to approach the New Yalta Agreement. In the end, what will matter is the percentage of the world's GDP that supports it. Is is possible to have it done in about a year. It will be the end of NWO's plan and the end of EU. It make take some time though to implement the Agreement but a very important progress would have been made.