Time vs support

The time needed for New Yalta Agreement process is an important issue. We claimed that it could take one to two years to make it final. This is a reasonable length of time but it could take less or more than that. Actually, it is very hard to predict how long it will take because we do not know the approach Real G4 will follow. It is even possible to have the Agreement ready in three to four months.

Here is a feasible scenario. Real G4 make a quick preliminary Agreement without involving any other countries. They do not even have to meet. They could just discuss it over the phone or in video conferences. They could choose one of the many scenarios presented in AntiNWO's Plan A or Plan B. Then, they run it through a number of countries (rounds approach) and when it reaches 67% of the world's GDP, they make it final.

After that, implementation can start and at the same time, they can try to get more support from the rest of the countries. This can be completed in three to four months. An Agreement can be made without involving any other countries. Of course, they will get the support from other countries but it would be a "take it or leave it" situation, no changes will be made.

Real G4 can set a target, a minimum percentage of the world's GDP that will support the Agreement. We suggested two thirds or 67% but it can be something other than that. This is not the only way to go though. They could set as a goal to reach the highest possible support. Two thirds (67%) is very strong support but three fourths (75%) is stronger and four fifths (80%) even better.

Probably, Real G4 will be able to get 67% in Real G30, the thirty largest economies. If they want to get higher support, they should involve directly in the process more countries. What if instead of G30, they involve G50? Some countries will be excluded, mostly in EU occupied territory. Let's say that ten (10) countries are excluded. So there are forty (40) countries left.

If Real G4 have to deal with twenty (20) countries, it will be on average five (5) countries for each. If they have to deal with forty (40) countries, it will be on average of ten (10) countries for each. Ten (10) is twice more but still not a big number and manageable. It is a number Real G4 will be able to handle. The process becomes more complex and more lengthy but it should result also in higher support for New Yalta Agreement.

So another parameter is the number of countries that will get involved directly in the process. Initially we claimed that Real G4 should deal with Real G30 because it seems that they will be able to get 67% with these countries. From G30, around twenty (20) will remain. Some countries, mainly in EU occupied territory, will be excluded because they are in the wrong direction.

But it could be more or less than thirty (30) countries to start with and then exclude all these that are in the wrong direction. The minimum number of countries directly involved are four (4), Real G4. The highest is the number of all countries in the world, one hundred and ninety five (195) or one hundred and ninety seven (197). That would lead to the highest support but would also be extremely complex and lengthy, impossible to handle.

So if Real G4 want to get the highest possible support, they should involve directly in the process, the highest number of countries they can handle. That will be complex and lengthy but feasible. Time is important for two reasons. First of all, the sooner the New Yalta Agreement gets finalized, the sooner it can start to be implemented. Also real G4 have many other things to do.

The fastest approach would probably be to not get any other countries involved. They could make a relatively quick decision, choosing one of the options presented in AntiNWO's Plan A or Plan B. Then they try to get support for the Agreement from the rest of the countries, without making any changes. Most likely, they will reach 67% of world's GDP. When they reach that target (or another they have set), they can make it final.

There is also the "in between" approach, a balance between time and support. Real G4 will make a preliminary agreement. Then they will involve directly in the process a number of countries and make changes in order to get them to support it. This will not be the highest number of countries they can handle but one that will not make the process complex and lengthy. It will not lead to the highest possible support but will save a lot of time.

Finally, we will sum up the different approaches explained, including time, complexity and level or support. Real G4 could make a preliminary Agreement and then get G30 directly involved. Based on the feedback they receive from G30, they will make changes. This is a balancing time and support approach. After the countries that are in the wrong direction are excluded, there will be roughly twenty countries left. This is not the highest number of countries G4 can handle and will not lead to the highest support.

But it will save time and make the process less complex. Also the goal of 67% should be reached and with the support of countries below G30 will get higher. Another way is to set a target percentage, probably 67%. They will involve a number of countries, starting from the top of the list with the largest economies. They will not need to reach that target with these countries but something below that.

They will take their chances to get the percentage missing to reach the target in the rest of the countries. For instance, they could get 58% from the countries directly involved and estimate to get 9% more from the rest of the countries to reach 67%. This approach should be faster and less complex than the previous because probably fewer countries will get directly involved.

They will just go down the list of the largest economies and make some modifications to the preliminary Agreement according to the feedback they receive. When they reach a percentage that seems safe, they stop making changes and try the Agreement with the rest of the countries, hoping to get the support needed for the target they have set, probably 67%.

The rounds approach could be the fastest because only G4 will get directly involved. It will depend on the number of rounds needed to reach the target. It is possible that only one round will be needed. Real G4 will make a preliminary Agreement and run it through fifty (50), seventy five (75) or one hundred (100) countries. If they reach the target, they make it final. If they don't, they make changes and go for another round.