Two Eastern European Groups

In AntiNWO's plan, the two Eastern European Subgroups will be separate Groups for some period. Before we explain this further, we need to make something very clear. This is the best approach, the one AntiNWO recommends. It REQUIRES that EU's WESTERN EUROPEAN countries SEPARATE from EASTERN the soonest possible. If this does not happen, the best approach can't be followed.

Valuable time lost will have to be made up. Procedures must be rushed through. ANYWAY that could LEAD to the TWO EUROPEAN GROUPS, Western and Eastern, as described in AntiNWO's plan WILL BE GOOD. There are a few ways to do that. For instance, countries that are not in EU could join Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) since it is already a group. EU countries could be added at a later time, all together or one by one.

The RECOMMENDED APPROACH is BEST for all sides. They should agree to separate Western European countries from Eastern in EU, as soon as possible (ASAP). Because this is the only way the best approach can be followed. Other alternatives are much worse. Nevertheless, if the best approach is not feasible, other ways that are not as good should be used to get the end result, the two European Groups.

According to the best approach, recommended by AntiNWO, Eastern European countries will exit EU. In this way, Western European Group can be considered continuation of EU and EU's authority and prestige for its remaining time will not be harmed. When they exit, they will form a separate Group right away. There will be a period of smooth transition. Matters will remain as they were in EU. Also there will be time for improvement in relations with Russia, where they are bad.

This is mostly in Region A1 that will include Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries and Ukraine. In Region A2, there are some NWO fanatics like Mitsotakis that have anti-Russian stance. But this does not reflect the way people feel. Western Europe has also anti-Russian position currently. On the contrary, USA has good relations. if this is an overstatement, relations are certainly not bad.

Western Europe and Region A1 have currently bad relations with Russia. USA and Region A2 do not have bad relations. This is another reason Region A2 should have orientation towards North America and Region A1 towards Western Europe. Of course, in the future the situation could change and relations with Russia could become good or at least not bad.

As it can be seen in Table B of Appendix 24, Subgroup A of Eastern European Group has 42% of the population while Subgroup B (CIS) has 58%. Only Georgia is currently not in Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) but can be added. Georgia can not be placed in Subgroup A because of its geographic location. If Ukraine is in Subgroup A, Moldova has to be also in it because of its geographic location.

In Subgroup A, 62% of the population is in EU and 38% not in EU. EU countries have almost two thirds of the population. It is reasonable to make EU countries the core of the Subgroup (temporarily a Group) and gradually add one third of the population. Unlike Subgroup A, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is ready. All they need to do is prepare to become a relatively autonomous Subgroup of Eastern European Group 4.

There are three categories of countries in Eastern European Group; a) 26% in EU b) 16% in ino Group c) 58% in CIS (Georgia included). The best approach would be if the countries in EU exited, formed a temporary autonomous Group and gradually added the countries that are not in EU. Currently, there are many NWO puppet governments that are an obstacle because they are not willing to exit EU.

A second alternative would be if the countries that are not in any Group joined CIS. Then it would be a total of 58 + 16 = 74%. Almost three quarters of the Eastern European Group will be complete. At some time in the future, the remaining 26% could be added, gradually or at once. This is not the best approach but one that could work well if the best one is not possible.

There could be gradual enlargement of CIS until all the countries that are supposed to be in the Group are included. Some people may argue that the countries that are in no Group should join EU. Almost all of them, except Israel, are candidates to become members. This would be a big mistake and the reason is very simple. This would be an entirely meaningless action because in the end, WESTERN EUROPEAN countries will form a SEPARATE GROUP.

Suppose that they join EU. In the future, 75% of EU's population will be in a different Group, Western European. If Eastern European countries refuse to exit EU, AntiNWO governments in WESTERN EUROPE will EXIT EU to FORM a SEPARATE GROUP. WESTERN EUROPEAN voters do NOT WANT to BE in the SAME GROUP with EASTERN EUROPEAN countries. The irony is that ADDITION of MORE EASTERN EUROPEAN countries in EU will make SEPARATION DESIRE in WESTERN EUROPE even BIGGER.

Since Eastern European countries that are not in EU, in the end will be in the same Group with CIS countries and not with Western European countries, it is much more reasonable to join CIS instead of EU. Countries that are not in any Group have three alternatives to join; a) CIS b) EU c) Subgroup A of Eastern European Group. The third one is the best alternative and the one that AntiNWO recommends.

But this requires that EU's Eastern European countries separate from Western the soonest possible and form a temporary autonomous Group. If this is not done, countries in no Group have only two alternatives, join EU or CIS. Probably it would be a lot faster to join CIS and it is the right thing to do since in the end they will be in the same Group with CIS countries and not with Western European countries.

Suppose they join EU. That would be really meaningless and waste of time. But even if they do this mistake, it can be corrected. More Eastern European countries will exit EU in the future. And if they refuse to do it, WESTERN EUROPEAN countries will EXIT EU to form a SEPARATE GROUP. So MANY of the EASTERN EUROPEAN countries that will be LEFT OUT, will eventually JOIN CIS which will have become bigger.