What people want 2
What people want 2
Similar people can understand each other, communicate and cooperate better. PEOPLE WANT to be with SIMILAR PEOPLE. That is the guideline AntiNWO's grouping follows. Groups are as homogeneous as possible. There are some restrictions though, geographic location and population. The effort in AntiNWO's grouping was to place people with similar people while satisfying the restrictions.
A good example of geographic location restrictions is Australia. Australians may be somewhat similar to Northwestern Europeans but because they are located in Southern Pacific they can't be in Western European Group. They are placed in Southeastern Asian Group 10, even though there is some lack of homogeneity with the rest of the countries in the Group.
An example of population restrictions is Mexico. It would fit better in Central and South American Group 2. In that case, the two American Groups would have significant population difference with each other and the rest of the Groups. So Mexico is placed in North American Group 1 with USA and Canada since geographically it is in North America. Also Mexico and Canada are USA's largest trading partners.
One very important and useful feature in AntiNWO's plan is further Group division in Subgroups and Regions. In this way, even more homogeneity, further decentralization and better organization can be achieved. Europe is divided into two Groups, Western and Eastern. Western European Group is more homogeneous compared to EU. Also there are two Subgroups, Northern and Southern. They are even more homogeneous, compared to Western European Group.
There could be further division into Regions. Eastern European Group has two Subgroups with two Regions each. Alternatively, there could be four Subgroups. Each of the four Regions (or Subgroups) is a lot more homogeneous, compared to Eastern European Group. Arab Group 5 could be divided into two Subgroups, North African and Southwestern Asian. Likewise, there can be further division in most Groups.
All EU's fundamentals are fundamentally wrong. EU has common currency and free movement of people, products, capital. Some peope believe this is wonderful while other people believe this is horrible. There is also a third category which is indifferent. It does not matter what percentages each category has. Regardless the category they are in, PEOPLE WANT THINGS that WORK WELL.
Common currency and free movement of people, products, capital are extremely problematic. They have some benefits but their shortcomings are bigger and more important. Also there are other ways that can be used to get the advantages without the disadvantages. These have been explained very thoroughly in previous articles. We will not repeat them because they are many.
We will only give an example. With free movement of people, workers from one country in a Group can fill job vacancies in other countries of the Group. This benefit can be accomplished better with migration programs. As it has been explained, in AntiNWO's plan, there is also a migration program between Groups to FILL job vacancies.
Another migration program for Groups is EXCHANGE. Equal numbers of people could be exchanged between Groups. There may be other migration programs between Groups. The process for tourist visas could become easier. So in AntiNWO's plan there would be movement of people not only inside the Groups but also between Groups but in a much more organized way, having only advantages without the disadvantages.
Nevertheless, AntiNWO is not dogmatic like NWO. These extremely narrow minded people have a dogma that common currency and free movement of people, products, services, capital are wonderful and beneficial even if all these are tremendously problematic and have many disadvantages. AntiNWO has no dogma that all these are necessarily always bad.
So far, the experience from EU and NWO's failed plan has proven that these are exceedingly problematic. Each Group is a different case and has different conditions. If in a Group, one of the elements in NWO's dogma works well, AntiNWO is not against implementing it. AntiNWO examines if something works well and weighs the advantages and disadvantages. NWO starts with the dogma that these are good and never examines if they work well.
PEOPLE WANT FREEDOM. AntiNWO gives them freedom. Power to nations is power to people. NWO's fanatics are trying to impose their will and their beliefs on people. They have taken away the power from people in EU and plan to do the same in the other three pseudo - continental Unions, American, Asian, African. In NWO's plan, vicious cabal will control the four pseudo-continental Unions and Global Government.
PEOPLE want to HAVE the BEST SYSTEMS in their country. In AntiNWO's plan there is this possibility. There is a process designed by AntiNWO so that Groups can find the best systems and make them available to their member countries. It will be optional for countries to implement them but which country would not want to have the best systems? Groups could also cooperate regarding this matter.
As it was mentioned in the previous article, people do not want Global Government, let alone an NWO Global Dictatorship. Nevertheless, they want global cooperation in global matters only. In AntiNWO's plan, this will be attained with the 10 + 2 Council. In addition to global cooperation there will be cooperation inside groups, between groups and between countries, regions or subgroups of different groups.
PEOPLE WANT PEACE and PROSPERITY all over the world. They want PROBLEMS to be FIXED, CONFLICTS to be resolved. NWO's fanatics do not care if they create problems, conflicts, wars. They do not care to fix any problems. All they care about is to implement their vicious plan for European and Global Dictatorship. AntiNWO's plan will bring peace and prosperity all over the world, fix most problems and end most conflicts. There will be rapid development in less developed countries.
In certain countries, people want to be in a Group but PREFER MORE INDEPENDENCE. This is possible with trading partner status. Trading partners are independent countries that have similar trading privileges with members. A trading partner status may be chosen for different reasons. It has advantages and disadvantages. A trading partner has more independence compared to members but does not participate in decision making and is not part of the economic plan.
What was mentioned in the two articles so far is not all. Most of what is contained in AntiNWO's plan is WHAT PEOPLE WANT. It was designed having as guidelines PEOPLE'S PREFERENCES. That is why it will certainly prevail in the long run. Eventually, what people want will happen, not what a vicious cabal wants. AntiNWO is the future and NWO - EU are the past.