AntiNWO's Plan B 3

AntiNWO’s Plan B 2

When countries will be forming the Groups, they should have in mind the Coalitions as well. A lower and an upper limit on a Group's population should be agreed. This is an important point because it will determine whether a number of countries can be a Group. If they are above the upper limit, they must break in two or more Groups. If they are below the lower limit, they must be a Subgroup or a Region. Regions are the building blocks of Subgroups, Subgroups of Groups and Groups of Coalitions.

Even if a number of countries are within the range to form a Group, for their own reasons, they may want to be Subgroup in a Group or Region in a Subgroup. Actually, the only reason that we can think of is to have closer relations with the rest of the countries in the Subgroup/Group. In that case they will have less autonomy but they may have other benefits. Obviously, if they are a Group, they will have more autonomy.

Most of the points and reasoning used in Plan A can also be used in Plan B to form Regions, Subgroups, Groups, Coalitions. Most countries in Western Europe are Celtic or Germanic. Exceptions are Italy, Austria, Finland, Switzerland. Italy is the only Latin country in Europe and the world. Germanic countries are Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden. The rest are Celtic but some of them have considerable Germanic ancestry.

Austria is closer racially to Eastern Europe. Finland's main ancestry is Uralic but secondary is Nordic (Germanic). Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Finland could be included in "Germanic" countries with a loose definition. In Austria they speak German and Dutch is a Germanic language. Switzerland has German, French and Italian part. German speaking part is the largest. Italian part is small so it can be considered Germanic and Celtic to a large extent. 

English is a Germanic language and Anglosaxons were Germanic tribes. Nevertheless, people in England have mostly Celtic ancestry since ancient Britons were Celts. France, Spain, Portugal speak Latin languages but people have mainly Celtic ancestry. In France they have considerable Germanic ancestry also. One way to form Groups (or Subgroups) is to have Celtic countries together and Germanic countries together. In that case, UK and Ireland will be together with France, Spain, Portugal.

Generally countries that speak Latin languages are Catholic and those that speak Germanic languages are Protestant. Another way to form Groups (or Subgroups) is to have Catholic or Latin language speaking countries together and Protestant or Germanic language speaking countries together. In that case Italy will be with France, Spain, Portugal. UK and Ireland will be with Germanic countries. If France and Italy are together in a Group (or Subgroup), Switzerland should be with them. Otherwise it should be with Germany.

Many countries in Eastern Europe are Christian Orthodox. Their population in millions is shown below.

In Armenia, they have Oriental Orthodoxy and adhere miaphysitism. Bosnia (31%) and Kazakhstan (24%) have also considerable percentage of Orthodox Christians. The population of Orthodox countries is roughly two hundred and fifty million (250 mil).

It is a little more than the two Groups (or Subgroups) in Western Europe. Orthodox countries could form a Group. Even if they are not all in the same Group, Orthodox countries should be in the same Coalition. Most Balkan countries are Orthodox and originate from Byzantine Empire. Byzantine Empire had very close relations with Kievan Rus. Countries that originate from Kievan Rus are Russia, Belarus, Ukraine.

Byzantine Empire's borders changed throughout the centuries. Byzantine Empire was mainly Greco-Thraco-Illyrian. But there were also Greco-Thaco-Illyrian territories that were outside Byzantine Empire. Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries should be together because the share common ancestry, Greco-Thraco-Illyrian, Slavic and a little Ural-Altaic.

Italy is a unique case because it is the only Latin country in Europe and the world. It can be placed with Catholic, Latin speaking countries or with Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries. Obviously Israel can't be together with Arab or Muslim countries. The closest non-Arab and non-Muslim countries are Greco-Thraco-Illyrian. It could also be placed with Western European countries. It is a possibility, although not the best alternative.

USA is Israel's closest ally. An option mentioned was (Israel) to be USA territory. Trump claims that Gaza will be owned by USA. In Plan B, it is possible for Israel to be in USA's Coalition, even if it may not be in any Group. This will be an exception because the situation in Israel is very complex and difficult. Generally, the rule is that Groups will be the building blocks of Coalitions, not countries. Separate countries can't participate in a Coalition. The rule has some exceptions though.

China and India are exceptions because they have such large population, more than four times that of USA which is in third place. China and India can be in a Coalition without being in a Group. For different reasons, Israel could be another exception and placed in USA's Coalition, without being in a Group. This can also happen in Plan A but Coalitions which are optional must be formed. Otherwise, Israel will be in no Group and no Coalition.

Trump wants USA and Canada to be one country. In Plan A, Mexico is in the same Group with USA - Canada. There is some lack of homogeneity but it is manageable. In Plan B, USA and Canada can form a Group with very close relations. They wlll have roughly three hundred and eighty million population. There can be two more Groups in American continent with approximately the same population. They can all be in the same Coalition.

In conclusion, we will compare AntiNWO's two plans, A and B. In both Plans, there are four Coalitions with roughly two billion people each. Groups are the building blocks of Coalitions. They can be further divided in Subgroups and Regions. Groups must be spatially continuous but this is not necessary for Coalitions. Relations in Coalitions will be loose and in Groups closer.

In Plan A, Coalitions are optional. The ten Groups must have roughly the same population. Following the general guidelines of the grouping suggested is a red line. In Plan B, Coalitions are required. Groups do not need to have roughly equal population. There will be a lower and an upper limit in a Group's population. AntiNWO can't suggest a way to form Groups and Coalitions because there are endless alternatives. But there are certain points from Plan A that should be followed.

AntiNWO considers BOTH PLANS, A and B, MAGNIFICENT. Each one has certain advantages. Plan A is much more flexible than NWO's disastrous plan. Plan B is even more flexible and perceived as more fluid than Plan A. People find Plan A more solid than Plan B and prefer it. Nevertheless, the FLUIDITY of PLAN B will be a BIG ADVANTAGE, if Plan A stumbles and can't overcome certain obstacles.

AntiNWO is currently promoting the more popular Plan A. It does not support all three plans at the same time because AntiNWO side will be divided into three parts while NWO has only one plan which they all support. If for whatever reasons, the more popular Plan A can't proceed, AntiNWO will try to have Plan B implemented. And if this is not possible either, it will continue with Plan C "No Groups - dissolve damned EU and all Unions".

No European family   Two Europes   European tribes’ mix   Greco-Thraco-Illyrian Region 1