Sets and categories
Sets and categories
There are three thousand one hundred and fifty (3.150) combinations for AntiNWO's four Coalitions. Five (5) cases were examined in a previous article. One of them currently has a comfortable lead. Another one could have been in the first place, under different circumstances. In addition to the five combinations examined, there are three thousand one hundred and forty five (3.145) more!
Whatever will be decided will remain for long time, perhaps centuries. In historical time, two or three centuries is a short period. But compared to human life span, it is a very long period. If we take thirty years as the length of a generation, three centuries are ten generations. In three centuries, the great grandchildren of the grandchildren of current generation's grandchildren will live!
Although there is a combination that currently has a comfortable lead, some decision makers want to take a better look at the various combinations, since the choice will last for centuries. The number of alternatives is huge. It will be helpful to put Groups into sets and combinations into categories. There are a few ways to make sets of Groups and categorize the possible combinations.
We will use numbers for Groups since we will show many combinations. There are 10+2 Groups; 1) North America 2) South & Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe & ACA 5) Arab Group 6) Northern Subsaharan Africa 7) Southern Subsaharan Africa 8) Southwestern Asia 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia & Oceania 11) India 12) China. ACA is Azerbaijan and Central Asian countries. Instead of North-South, there can be East-West division in eastern Asia and Subsaharan Africa.
The 10+2 Groups can be divided into six sets; A) 1-2 B) 3-4 C) 5-8 D) 6-7 E) 9-10 F) 11-12. The last set is China and India. Their Coalition will have one more Group. They could be combined with another set. There are five ways to do it, F-A, F-B, F-C, F-D, F-E. Each one has two alternatives. Many people in AntiNWO believe that F-E is best, combine China and India with the two eastern Asian Groups 9 and 10.
In that case, there are two alternatives, 9-11 and 10-12 or 9-12 and 10-11. But China and India could be combined with another set. If set F is combined with set C, the alternatives are 11-5 and 12-8 or 11-8 and 12-5. There is a total of 5 X 2 = 10 ten combinations for China's and India's Coalition with this reasoning while the total number of all combinations is 9 X 10 = 90 (for China's and India's Coalition).
To each one of the combinations for China's and India's Coalitions, there are thirty five alternatives for the remaining eight Groups. Suppose that set F is combined with E, China and India are together with eastern Asian Groups 9 and 10. The rest of the Groups are are in four sets; A) 1-2 B) 3-4 C) 5-8 D) 6-7. One way to form the two remaining Coalitions is to have the sets together.
This is theoretical because as matters stand currently, Western European Group 3 can't be in the same Coalition with Eastern European Group 4. In order for that to be possible, Western European NWO must give ASAP the order to their puppets in Eastern Europe to exit EU. Alternatively, NWO governments in Western Europe should be replaced with AntiNWO very soon. These are unlikely to happen.
For the sake of argument, suppose that one of the two happens. There are three ways to combine the four sets in two Coalitions, A-B and C-D, A-C and B-D, A-D and B-C. Or if we use Groups, the three options are, 1-2-3-4 and 5-8-6-7, 1-2-5-8 and 3-4-6-7, 1-2-6-7 and 3-4-5-8. The first one is compromising combination. Another way is to take one Group from each set in a Coalition.
There are two ways to combine set A with set B, 1-4 and 2-3 or 1-3 and 2-4. There are two ways to combine sets C and D, 5-6 and 8-7 or 5-7 and 8-6. So finally we get; 1-4-5-6 and 2-3-8-7, 1-4-5-7 and 2-3-8-6, 1-4-8-6 and 2-3-5-7, 1-4-8-7 and 2-3-5-6, 1-3-5-6 and 2-4-8-7, 1-3-5-7 and 2-4-8-6, 1-3-8-6 and 2-4-5-7, 1-3-8-7 and 2-4-5-6.
One category of combinations can be those that sets are together. Another category could be those where there is one Group from each set in every Coalition. The six sets used so far were according to geographical proximity and some other factors. But there are other ways to form sets. One option is to have sets according to per capita income.
It is certain that North American Group 1 and Western European 2 are in the first two places. Also it is certain that the two Subsaharan African are in the last. Most likely, Eastern European 3 and Northeastern Asian 9 are in third and fourth place. For the ranking of the other Groups, we take a guess which may not be correct. According to income, the six sets could be; A) 1-3 B) 4-9 C) 5-10 D) 2-8 E) 6-7 F) 11-12.
A similar process to what was described earlier can be followed with these new sets. China and India are not last in terms of per capita income. They are special cases and placed in the last set. It does not matter if our guess regarding ranking was incorrect because here we are not making decisions but only giving examples. If decision makers want to follow this route, they will find out exactly the ranking of each Group.
It is prudent to examine more alternatives since the choice will remain for centuries. It does not hurt to look more carefully into many combinations. Sets and categories may be very helpful. Nevertheless, it may not have much practical value. The availability reasoning is the most practical and also serves the goal to exert control over Western Europe.
Real Coalitions should be formed with the available Groups, those that actively support AntiNWO's spectacular plan. Opponents, NWO's supporters, should be placed in a Pseudo-Coalition. They will have the option to make this a real Coalition in the future. The feasible combination that has a comfortable lead is more likely to happen but the "tournament" is not over yet.