Plan B2 grouping comments

In the previous article, we explained why the division of Europe in Table A of Appendix 29 may be a good alternative. The participation of Scandinavia - Finland and Austria (SFA)  in eastern Group could be beneficial to them for various reasons explained. Also, Germany may end up supporting it because in this way, it could be indirectly involved in Eastern Europe through SFA.

In " Plan B2 grouping cases", it was mentioned that Norway and Denmark could be in western Group and Sweden and Finland in Eastern. The populations of western and eastern Group will become 393,2 and 359 million respectively. If Kazakhstan is added to eastern, its population will become roughly 380 million and the two Groups will have roughly the same population.

Another alternative is if Austria is in western Group and Scandinavia - Finland in eastern. Norway and Denmark have roughly equal population with Austria. Western Group will have 391 million and eastern 382, with Kazakhstan. We can't present all the alternatives, they are too many. AntiNWO's decision makers will have to figure out the rest of the alternatives.

We have presented many tables in several appendices showing data about countries, Regions, Subgroups, Groups, Coaltions. These data are mostly population but other as well, GDP, GDP per capita etc. This may seem to many people a difficult, confusing and tedious job. AntiNWO's DECISION MAKERS will have to include some DATA ANALYSIS (mostly population) while MAKING DECISIONS. Fortunately for them, they will NOT do that on their OWN.

They will have others doing it for them. AntiNWO's decision makers will be politicians. For most of them, unless their profession is related to data analysis, this will be a difficult job. They will certainly need the ASSISTANCE of EXPERTS, ECONOMIC DATA ANALYSTS, FINANCIAL DATA ANALYSTS, BUSINESS DATA ANALYSTS, GEOGRAPHIC DATA ANALYSTS, other DATA ANALYSTS. For these EXPERTS, it is a VERY EASY JOB with the USE of the RIGHT TOOLS.

AntiNWO's plan is from the 21st century and uses all the latest scientific developments. NWO's grouping was decided some time in the Dark Ages. The people that decided had very limited knowledge. All they knew was that threre were three continents, Europe, Asia, Africa. Since the Dark Ages, NWO's grouping has not changed. AntiNWO uses scientists and NWO uses very confused rappers, other unstable musicians and Holywood weirdos.

Instead of SFA, Italy can be with Eastern European countries. This is shown In Table B of Appendix 29, and in the two tables of Appendix 20. The arguments regarding Italy's placement with eastern European countries have been presented in many previous articles that dealt with Italy - German Wannabes swap in AntiNWO's Plan A. The arguments are the same. 

Italy vs German Wannabes     Italy’s rational decision     Benefits with Italy

There does not seem to be a very important reason for not placing a few (one in the case o Italy) Western European countries in the same Group with Eastern. For the sake of argument, let's assume that no Western European country can be in the same Group with Eastern. This will not be any problem because AntiNWO's Plan B offers enormous flexibility and Plan B2 even more. 

It is preferable if the two Groups in Europe have roughly the same population but not necessary. In Plan A, the ten Groups have roughly equal population and Coalitions are optional. In Plan B and B2, Coalitions are a requirement. The effort is to have four Coalitions with roughly equal population. In Plan B, there should be a range for the Groups' populations. It the range is small, populations are more even but if it is larger, there is more flexibility.

A range has an upper and a lower limit. In Plan B2, there is no range but an upper limit. That is the only requirement for the size of Groups because Coalitions will have roughly equal size. The division (SFA with Eastern European countries) presented in Table A of Appendix 29 seems like a very good option, better than Italy's placement with Eastern European countries. But the alternatives in Table B of Appendix 29 and Appendix 20 are also good.

However, the two European Groups do not need to have equal size in terms of population. An alternative regarding the American and European Groups is shown in Appendix 30. North American Group has 376 million, Central 316 million and Southern 326 million. Central Group has more countries than Central America and Southern Group fewer than South America.

Western European Group has 418 million and Eastern 334 million, including Georgia and Armenia. Western is exactly the same like in Plan A. If Kazakhstan is added to Eastern Group, the population will become 354 million. If the rest of ACA (Azerbaijan - Central Asia) are also added, the population goes up to 426 million. This is like Eastern European Group in Plan A (without Israel).

Due to the Bunny Effect, Mexico, Cuba or any Latin country can't be in North American Group. But this does not prohibit other Groups from being in Plan B or B2 like they were in Plan A. The only restriction is the upper limit. So if the upper limit is 450 million, Western and Eastern European Group and Group 8 shown in Appendix 12 could be like in Plan A.

But Arab Group 5, also shown in Appendix 12, can't be like in Plan A because the population is above the upper limit of 450 million. If Sudan and Somalia are not included, the population is much below 450 million. Suppose that the upper limit is set to 400 million. In that case, some Western European countries will have to be omitted from the Group. If Scandinavia and Finland (SFA) are omitted that have a population of 27,5 million, the Group's population falls to 391 million.

SFA would have to be added to eastern Group and its population will become 361 million. Still, it has almost 40 million margin to the upper limit of 400 million. One or more countries could be added. There are no more countries to add on western side. One or more will have to be found in easern side. Kazakhstan, with a population of 20 million is a good alternative. With Kazakhstan, the population goes up to 381 million.

Plan A has NOT been ABANDONED. Plan A REMAINS AntiNWO's PROPOSAL, until decision makers manage to AGREE on an OPTION of PLAB B or B2. Plan A still has GOOD CHANCES to be selected. What the Bunny effect did, was to give to Plans B and B2 more chances than Plan A. But Bunny Effect decreased even more the chances of NWO's Plan and increased the chances of AntiNWO's Plan (A, B or B2) overall.