Eastern Europe's Coalition

Coalitions of Countries is a possible scenario. In the previous article we stated that Russia, Belarus, Ukraine should be together with Eastern European countries. If they are not with all of them, they should be together with at least Orthodox countries. Whether Eastern European countries will be in the same Coalition with Western is a wholly different issue. We should expain these better.

Religious are probably the least important reasons for having at least Orthodox countries in the same Coalition. There are geographic, cultural, historical and most importantly economic reasons. Orthodox countries originate from Byzantine Empire and Kievan Russes that had very close relations for centuries. Hellenistic is the foundation of the culture in Eastern European Orthodox countries and to a lesser extent in all Eastern Europe.

Byzantines were initially mainly Hellenes-Thracians-Illyrians but Byzantine Empire did not include all Greco-Thraco-Illyrian territory. If we add the rest of Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries to Orthodox, only the northwestern part of Eastern Europe is left, Poland, Czechia and Baltic counties (PCB or German Wannabies). Preferably, this part will also be included but it is not necessary. If PCB are smart enough, they will be together with the rest of Eastern European countries.

As a matter of fact, if SFA (Scandinavia, Finland, Austria) are smart enough, they will be included too. Austria is closer genetically to Eastern Europe. A large part of Austria was Greco-Thraco-Illyrian territory. Finland's main ancestry is Uralic. Sweden and Norway have significant Uralic ancestry. Finland, Sweden and northern Norway are geographically in Eastern Europe.

Hellenistic culture was Hellenic with significant influence from the lands in Alexander's Empire. These were mainly in Balkans, Asia and North (Mediterranean) Africa. Eastern Europeans have some Ural-Altaic ancestry. Eastern Europe is closer geographically, culturally, genetically to Asia compared to Western Europe. This is an advantage Eastern Europeans have that do not use.

If Eastern Europeans were smart, they should be selling to Western Europeans products made in Asia. Instead of that, the opposite happens. Western Europeans sell to Eastern products made in Asia with their brand names. And even if not all the product is made in Asia, often a large part is and afterwards assembled in Western Europe. Western Europeans sell to Eastern even products made in other countries of Eastern Europe.

Western European NWO propaganda has brainwashed Eastern Europeans that Western Europe has the best systems. This is another deception. Asia (Japan, Hong Kong, S. Korea, Singapore etc) has the best systems in railways, air transport, sea transport and many other areas. Generally, Eastern European countries are harmed by their participation in EU. People in Eastern European pro-EU parties are either big idiots or big traitors.

As matters stand currently, there are a lot more chances that Eastern Europe will be in the same Coalition with Japan, S. Korea, Australia, New Zealand etc than with Western Europe. Nevertheless, nothing is certain yet. Of course, one option is to have Eastern Europe and the countries mentioned in the same Coalition with Western Europe. But this may or may not happen.

Australia and New Zealand have European culture but are located in Southern Pacific. Unavoidably, they are influenced by Asian culture and have relations with Asian countries. Japan had adopted systems from Western Europe and North America during Meiji Restoration. At that time, Western European systems were better than Japanese. However, today Japan has better systems than Western Europe in many areas.

Russia's inclusion is very important because it is Eastern Europe's bridge with Far East and the Pacific. Russia is an Eastern European country. For many centuries, Russia was entirely in Eastern Europe. But after the conquest of Siberia, it has a part in Asia. Today, Russia's eastern side is next to Japan and S. Korea. Belarus and Ukraine must be included also because they are between Russia and the rest of Eastern Europe.

Europe is a conventional continent. The real continent is Eurasia. Eastern Europe's relations with Asia should not be at a lower level than relations with Western Europe. They should be at equal or higher level. Eastern Europe's orientation towards Western Europe was a colossal mistake. There is a whole world besides Western Europe. Not even 5% of the world's population lives in Western Europe.

It is much better if Eastern Europe is in the same Coalition with some Asian and Oceanian countries. There have been some talks with Japan, S. Korea, Australia, New Zealand that went well. We should emphasize that it is Russia that connects Eastern Europe with the Pacific. So Russia's participation is very important mostly for economic reasons, not because it is an Orthodox country.

Eastern Europe is among the leaders of AntiNWO's plan and can gather countries in its Coalition. Obviously, Western European NWO puppets in Eastern Europe are not the leaders. These will be replaced with AntiNWO governments. Puppets do not want Eastern Europe to be among the leaders. They want Western Europe to be the leader as it is in NWO's plan.

Each one of the four Coalitions will have roughly one fourth of the world's population. There is room in a Coalition for Eastern Europe, some Asian countries (Japan, S. Korea etc), Oceania and Western Europe. AntiNWO does not oppose Western and Eastern Europe being in the same Coalition. But there is a requirement. Western Europe must terminate EU. There are no Groups or Unions in Coalitions of Countries. There is no EU in any of AntiNWO's plans.

It is unlikely that Western European NWO would ever abolish EU. These people are fanatics. It is possible that non-NWO governments would do it but it is not certain. For the sake of argument, let's assume that Western Europeans terminate that horrible monstrosity, EU. In that case, Western Europe can be in the same Coalition with Eastern. But it does not mean that they must be in the same Coalition.

Eastern Europeans should examine very carefully if it is beneficial to them to be in the same Coalition with Western Europeans (SFA excluded). At a first glance, it does not seem beneficial at all but a very careful examination is required. On the other hand, Western Europeans should also examine whether having other countries in their Coalition is preferable than having Eastern European countries.

They are obsessed with Eastern Europe because according to NWO's ridiculous plan one of the four Unions is European. EU would have a total population of roughly six hundred million. Instead of that, AntiNWO gives to Western Europeans a Coalition with two billion people, more than three times EU. They can be together with many of their former colonies. Of course, relations in the Coalitions will not be as close as in NWO's Unions. 

Western Europeans will not participate in the decision making regarding AntiNWO's plan because they are the main supporters of NWO's plan and the main opponents of AntiNWO's plan. They can only participate indirectly by expressing their preferences to the Leaders. It is very likely that decision makers will place them in the same Coalition with India and Mercosur countries. This is totally justifiable after the two trade deals they made.

Most of what was explained in Coalitions of Groups is valid for Coalitions of Countries. Western Europe, Mercosur countries and India can be in the same Coalition but there will be no Western European or South American Group. All the countries will be in the same Coalition without having any Groups. Nevertheless, nothing is certain and anything can happen in the future. The only certainty is that NWO's plan and EU will be terminated one way or the other.