Choose the poles

As it was explained in "Advanced poles", the advanced areas of the world are: 1) North America 2) Western Europe 3) Eastern Europe 4) Eastern Pacific (Japan, S. Korea, Australia, New Zealand). According to one reasoning, these should be the four poles of the four Coalitions. However, China is the world's largest economy (GDP in purchasing power parity - ppp), 50% larger than the second, USA. It is also very advanced technologically.

Many believe that China should be a pole. India is the third largest economy, after USA. In the future, India will be the second largest economy. According to a reasoning, India should also be a pole. The problem is that there can be only four poles because there should be four Coalitions. If there are six Coalitions, India and China will be in a "Coalition" with no other countries because each has one sixth (17,5 - 18%) of the world's population.

The thirty largest economies (ppp) and twenty strongest militaries were presented in "Four poles". If the largest economies are the four poles, these should be; 1) China 2) USA 3) India 4) Russia. If the countries with the strongest militaries are the poles, these should be; 1) USA 2) Russia 3) China 4) India. So both reasonings result in the same four countries, in a different order.

These could be combined with the economic advancement reasoning. USA will be with Canada while Russia will be with the rest of Eastern Europe. Eastern Pacific can be with Eastern Europe. Western Europe will be with India. So the four poles will be 1) North America 2) Western Europe + India 3) Eastern Europe + Eastern Pacific 4) China. But there are more reasonings that can be followed to determine the four poles.

According to another reasoning, the most advanced areas should be two poles and the two largest economies (ppp) the other two. Which are the two largest economies? Currently these are China and USA. In the future, India will be the second largest economy. Since the arrangement of international relations will last for several decades and probably for centuries, India should be considered the second largest economy. Therefore, two poles should be China and India.

The advanced areas should form the two other poles. One way is to have 1) North America + Western Europe 2) Eastern Europe + Eastern Pacific. In terms of spatial (geographic) proximity, this is good. But there are problems. North America + Western Europe pole is too strong, compared to the rest. Western Europe and North America are economic competitors and the two most advanced areas. Also Russia's relations with Eastern Pacific are not so good.

Another way is to have 1) North America + Eastern Europe (NAEE) 2) Western Europe + Eastern Pacific (WEEP). The populations in millions are; North America 376, Western Europe 418, Eastern Europe 334, Eastern Pacific 220. In North America, in addition to Canada, Greenland and Iceland are also included. In Eastern Pacific, Papua is included. The first pole (NAEE) will have 710 million and the second (WEEP) 638 million.

This alternative has pros and cons but it is an option. Western Europe is the main supporter of NWO's plan and the main opponent of AntiNWO's plan. How can Western Europe be a leader (pole) in a plan that it strongly opposes? That would not be a problem if Eastern Pacific was a stong supporter of AntiNWO's plan but this is not the case. They are not opponents like Western Europe but are not supporters either.

There have been talks between Eastern Europe and Eastern Pacific that went well. Eastern Pacific could be a pole with Eastern Europe which is one of the three leaders in AntiNWO's plan. But having as a pole a strong opponent and a non - supporter may not work that well. However, Western Europe + Eastern Pacific could be a pseudo - pole of a Pseudo - Coalition.

This means that the three other poles will gather countries or areas in their Coalition and the leftovers will be dumped in the Pseudo-Coalition where Western Europe + Eastern Pacific are the pseudo - pole. Otherwise, they would have to become strong supporters of AntiNWO's plan. It is unlikely that NWO's fanatics in Western Europe will ever do that. Obviously, Western Europe can never be with Eastern Europe or North America.

Another potential problem is Russia. It is too attached to China. Russia could be in a different Coalition from China but being in the same Coalition with USA does not seem very likely. Nonetheless, we can't speak on their behalf. If Russia does not want to be in the pole or in the Coalition, the rest of Eastern Europe could be. Russia and perhaps Belarus would be with China.

DECIDING the FOUR POLES is a very IMPORTANT STEP. When this is done, HALF of the EFFORT will have been ACCOMPLISHED. There will be COUNTRIES or AREAS that will JOIN RIGHT AWAY the four Coalitions because they have good relations with countries in the poles. For instance, Iran and allies may join immediately China's Coalition. Likewise, the area of Central American Group, in AntiNWO's Grouping B, may join ASAP USA's Coalition.

Coalitions can be incomplete for long time and function well. In order for that to happen, in addition to the poles, some other areas should be added. Most likely, this will happen very soon after the four poles have been decided. Completing Coalitions can be a slow and long process that could take many years, even decades. There will be no hurry regarding that.

Ideally, continuous areas should be added to Coalitons instead of separate countries. Also if separate countries are added, there should be an effort to make a continuous area by adding other countries around them in the same Coalition. Nevertheless, if this is not possible, it is acceptable to have separate countries in Coalitons that are not in a continuous area. But that should be the exception, not the rule.

The poles should be four because the Coaltions should be four. With six Coalitions, India and China will be on their own. With more than six Coalitions, the rest will have less population than China and India because each one of these two countries has roughly one sixth of the world's population (17,5 - 18%). Because of that, China's and India's Coaltions should become almost complete relatively soon.

Around 7 - 8% more should be added. In China's Coalition, the problem would be which countries or areas not to add. There are already more than enough countries or areas to be added. India has not done such a good job in establishing relations. It is not certain that there are already more than enough countries or areas. However, since only 7 - 8% more is needed, it won't be very difficult to make the Coalition almost complete or complete.

After China's and India's Coalitions are almost complete (or complete), the remaining countries/areas will have only two choices a) North America + Eastern Europe (NAEE) b) Western Europe + Easern Pacific (WEEP). Since WEEP will be a pseudo - pole, NAEE will choose the countries/areas that it wants and the rest will be placed in WEEP's Pseudo-Coalition. First and most important step is to determine the four poles.