Basis for changes

Alternative 4 seems very good. However, there can be changes. We will use Alternative 4 as the basis or foundation, since so far it seems to be the best alternative. If USA insists to have Mercosur+ in its Coalition C, Coalition A could get a part in Subsahararn Africa that has roughly equal population with Mercosur+ ( 326 million). Actually, it should be lower than that because Coalition A has 25,9%.

Another option is Coalition A to have the western part of North Africa and Subsaharan countries below while Coalition D will have the eastern part of Subsaharan Africa and Subsaharan countries below. It is better though if North Africa is not divided but participates as a whole in one Coalition. Suppose that France wants very much to have North Africa in its Coalition A.

First of all, they would have to convince Spain and Portugal because Coalition A would have to give up Mercosur+. Western Europe will not participate directly in decision making because they are the main supporters of NWO's plan. They can only participate indirectly. So French and Western Europeans would have to convince decision makers in Coalitions B, C, D to satisfy their desires.

North Africa is in Coalition D. So Mercorur+ would have to be exchanged for North Africa. In that case, Coalition A will have 24,6% and Coalition D 24%. If USA insists to have Mercosur+ in Coalition C, Coalition D can get an area in Subsaharan Africa with roughly 325 million (Mercosur+). The Middle Eastern area of Coalition C is next to North Africa. Can that area also be included in Coalition A?

It is not very likely because as the situation has evolved, Israel should be in the same Coalition with USA. After the wars in Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, there is opposition in Western and Eastern Europe to placing Israel in the same Coalition. Israel is perceived as trouble in Western and Eastern Europe. Western and Eastern Europeans want to avoid having troubles for no reason.

Also USA has managed to make some allies for Israel, in an area that is mostly hostile. Most of the countries in Arab Peninsula have become Israel's allies and are included in Coalition C. This allows Israel to expand influence to the South, in Subsaharan Africa. So far, it has been trying to expand influence to the wrong directions, in hostile areas. That expansive effort has created conflict and wars.

Israel has been looking towards the wrong direction because according to NWO's ridiculous plan, it would be in Asian Union. AntiNWO has tried to place Israel with Eastern Europe. It was not very easy from start. As matters have evolved with all the wars Israel is making, it has become more difficult. An alternative is Subsaharan Africa which is not friendly so far but not hostile either like the Asian countries that surround Israel.

Subsaharan Africa should be friendly towards African Americans (USA) since they originate from there. Jewish Americans already have a political alliance with African Americans.  For some strange reason, the majority of Jewish diaspora supports NWO's plan. They should be supporting AntiNWO's plan because AntiNWO offers alternatives that are not possible in NWO's ridiculous plan.

Eventhough it is mostly theoretical, for the sake of argument, we will examine the possibility that Israel and Arab Peninsula allies are together with North Africa in Coalition A. The percentage of Coalition A will increase to 25,5% while that of Coalition C will drop to 24,2%. There are several changes that can be made in Alternative 4. These can be better seen in Appendix 41.

The four Coaltions are broken up into parts, so that the changes can be made. These parts or areas have been presented in Appendix 40C and other previous Appendices. Starting from the top left in Table A of Appendic 40C, we find Western Europe (WE), South America (SAM), N. Korea - Taiwan - Mongolia (KTM). Muslim Asian (MAS) countries do not include Turkiye (TR) which is separate so that it can be moved to another Coalition.

MAF are the four Muslim countries in Africa, Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti, Comoros. On the right side of Table A, below USA are the five North Atlantic (NAT) countries. Greenland is not a country yet but it will become. The Central American area (CAM) follows and then Israel and Arab Peninsula allies (ME). Next we see Appendix 40B. In Table C, are North Africa (NAF) and Rest of Asia (RA).

Here, we use NAF instead of NA for North Africa in order to differentiate it from NAT (North Atlantic). In Table A of Appendix 40B, Eastern European area 1 (EE1) has all the countries of Region A , except SFA (Scandinavia - Finland - Austria). These are separately so that they can be moved to Coalition A. Eastern European area 2 is Region B of Table A (Appendix 40B), Russia, Belarus and ACA (Azerbaijan - Central Asia). Eastern Pacific (EP) is Region C.

We must make very clear that these are NOT GROUPS. There are NO GROUPS or UNIONS in Coalitions of Countries. These are GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS that can be included in the four Coalitions. Divisions and subdivisions in Coalitions of Countries are highly recommended, especially in Coalitions C and D that have many countries. However these are optional and a matter of internal organization that does not concern the other Coalitions.

Option 1 in Appendix 41 is Alternative 4. It seems very good but we will examine some possible changes. In Option 2, Mercosur+ (SAM) is in Coalition C with the Rest of the American continent. Coalition A gets 300 million in Subsaharan Africa (SAF1). The rest of Subsaharan Africa (SAF2), 859 million, remains in Coalition C. The percentages of the four Coalitions are, A 25,6%, B 26,3%, C 25,4% and D 22,7%.

In Option 3, Coalition A gets North Africa (NAF) and Coalition D Mercosur+ (SAM). The percentages are A 24,6%, B 26,3%, C 25,1% and D 24,0%. Option 4 is based on Option 3. Scandinavia - Finland - Austria (SFA) move to Coalition A and Turkey (TR) goes to Coalition D. The percentages are A 25,1%, B 25,3%, C 25,1% and D 24,6%. In this Option, all percentages are close to 25%.

Mercosur+ is not very far from Oceania which is in Coalition D. This does not show on the map. Turkiye is considered a NWO stronghold, like Western Europe. There is distrust of Turkey in Eastern Europe and opposition to Turkey's placement in Coalition D. However, it is possible to overcome the opposition. Placing Turkiye in Coalition D is difficult but not impossible.

to be continued...