Eastern Europe's process

Until recently, it was not certain if it would be Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan or Turkiye that would participate in Eastern European Group 4. Now it is certain that Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan will participate. So that makes the process easier for one simple reason. Subgroup B will be Commonwealth of Independent States - CIS which already exists.

Georgia withdrew in 2008. Ukraine does not participate but has not withdrawn yet and Moldova announced its intention to withdraw. Others remain in Commonwealth of Independent States - CIS and should prepare to become Subgroup B of Group 4. The rest of Eastern European Group 4 is Subgroup A. Most of the counties are currently EU members and should prepare to spin off.

It is not certain yet if it will be German Wannabes or Italy that will participate in the Group. It is certain though about Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries. If German Wannabes or Italy make their decision to participate soon, they could exit EU with Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries and it will be a one step exit. If not, there will be a two steps exit. Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries will exit first and at a later date, German Wannabes or Italy will exit.

Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries in EU are Hellas (Greece), Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Slovenia, Hungary, Slovakia. They should prepare to exit EU and make Region A2 of Group 4. Not in EU are Serbia, Montenegro, N. Macedonia, Albania, Bosnia, Moldova. Serbia, Montenegro and possibly N. Macedonia will start as members. So they should be in some kind of coordination with the rest of Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries that are in EU.

As shown in Table A of Appendix 9, German Wannabes (Poland, Czech Republic, Baltic countries) have a population of 54,7 million and Balkan countries 60,7 million. Hungary and Slovakia have together 15 million. So Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries have 75 million. If German Wannabes exit EU together with the rest of Eastern European countries, Slovakia could be in their Region A1 from start. Otherwise, Slovakia will initially be in Region A1.

Suppose that German Wannabes exit EU and participate in the Group later. It is possible for Slovakia to change Region later but that may have some difficulties. Hungary could also be in Region A1 as it will be explained. It is OK for Hungary and Slovakia to be in a different Region than the rest of Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries, since they will all be in the same Subgroup A.

Originally Israel was included in Group 4. Geographically it belongs in Group 5. AntiNWO was doing a favor not only to Israelis but also to Arabs when it did not include Israel in that Group. Israelis do not want to be in an Arab group and Arabs do not want Israelis in their Group. Obviously Israel can't be in Group 8 with Iran and Turkiye.

There are five options for Israel's placement; a) in Eastern European Group 4 b) in Western European Group 3 c) in no Group d) US territory e) not exist. There are no other options. Because of the war in Gaza, currently option a, participation in Group 4, seems entirely impossible. It is difficult but not impossible to be included in Western European Group 3.

That would be problematic because of the distance. The closest Western European country is Italy which is almost 2000 km away. Cyprus is a little more than 200 km away. Since Israel can't participate in Group 5, their best choice is to be included in Group 4 because it is closer than Group 3. Due to the War in Gaza, this is currently impossible. It could be possible though after one or two decades.

It will take till 2055 for the Group to get the final composition but there could be exceptions. An example is Albania which could be admitted after 2075, if they keep acting against AntiNWO's plan and the existence of Group 4. So 2055 is not a strict but a preferable time limit. We are not suggesting that Israel (if it exists) will or should participate in Group 4 but only that what is impossible presently, could be possible after many years.

In World War II, Germany and Italy were in Axis. France, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxemburg were with Allied Powers. In 1957, twelve years after the end of the war, they founded EEC. So, it could be possible for Israel to participate in Group 4 after many years but the conditions should be right. No matter what their coreligionists in Western Europe and USA tell them, they can be ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN in Israel that ANTNWO's plan WILL PROCEED.

If they want to be in Eastern European Group 4, they should start cultivating relations with countries that will be in that Group. These will decide if they will accept Israel in their Group, not Western Europeans or USA. Obviously it is not enough to have good relations with treasonous pro EU regimes in Hellas and Cyprus. Most likely, the world's biggest traitors will be in prison after some years and AntiNWO will be in power in both countries.

USA is Israel's closest and strongest ally but it is very far. Western Europe is closer but still far. Israelis should start taking relations with Eastern European countries more seriously, if they want to be in their Group. Otherwise they have other options, be in Group 3 or a US territory. In Group 4, they could be trading partners of members. If they become members, they will be in Region A2 because of Israel's geographic location.

In Table B, Appendix 9, a possible scenario for Group 4 is presented that includes Israel. Both Regions of Subgroup A have the same population, roughly seventy million. Hungary and Slovakia are with German Wannabes. So their Region A1, becomes bigger in terms of population and area. They can have their cozy Region A1 and everything would be just wonderful. The sooner German Wannabes pledge their participation in the Group, the better it would be for them and overall.

Finally, we mentioned that there was opposition from some Eastern European countries for Turkiye's participation in Group 4. If there is opposition for Turkiye shouldn't there be opposition for Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan as well ? After all they are even further east. There is opposition for all countries that are not in Eastern Europe.

There is opposition even for Armenia and Georgia. This is small because they are Christian and small countries, so the impact of their participation is small. Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan are Muslim countries. They are smaller than Turkiye. All together have equal population with Turkiye. Opposition for their participation is much smaller compared to that for Turkiye.

Countries in Subgroup B do not oppose their participation because they have been together for decades in Soviet Union and before that in Russian Empire. Countries in Subgroup A do not oppose much their participation because they will not be dealing with them directly. At the first level they will be dealing with the countries in their Region and at a second level with the other Region in Subgroup A. Only at a third level, Subgroup A will be dealing with Subgroup B.