Eurovision’s separation
Eurovision's separation
Soon, another Eurovision Song contest will be held. The contest is meaningless and cultural nazism. Countries that are not Western European should not participate. Their participation is derogatory and harmful for them. There will be separation between Western and Eastern Europe. This is red line for Anti-NWO that can not be crossed. It is a good chance for Eurovision to divide into Eastern Eurovision and Western Eurovision.
Eurovision contest started in 1956. Almost all countries that participated in the first years were Western European. France, Germany, Italy, Spain and United Kingdom are the big five that automatically qualify for the final. Today, many Eastern European countries participate. Even countries that are not in Eastern Europe have participated and still participate. Examples are Israel, Turkiye, Morocco, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Australia.
Why is Eurovision song contest meaningless and cultural nazism? Why is it diminishing and hurtful for non Western - European countries and should not participate? It is very simple and anybody can check it and understand it. Check the most popular songs in Eastern Europe. They are different than the ones with which Eastern European countries participate in Eurovision song contest.
Eastern Europeans do not "send" to Eurovision the songs that they like the most. They send the songs that they believe Western Europeans would like the most. Check the songs that are popular in Western Europe. These are similar to the ones they send to Eurovision contest. In Eurovision song contest, the songs that win are the ones that are better suited to Western European musical tastes.
If Eastern Europeans send the songs that they like the most, they would never win or even get a good placement. This is even more true for countries like Israel, Turkiye, Morocco, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan. This is derogatory and harmful for non-Western European countries. It is derogatory because they do not send songs that fit better their culture but songs that fit Western European culture.
In this way, they are promoting Western European culture, at the expense of their own culture. They are assisting Western Europe's cultural prevalence and this also helps Western Europe's overall prevalence, which was Hitler's goal. Anything that is not suitable to Western Europeans' music aesthetics is dubbed ethnic. Western European is the aesthetic norm and everything else is non-standard. This is unacceptable.
It would be very interesting, if non Western Europeans send to Eurovision the songs they really like which would be similar to the popular songs in their countries. Of course, these would perform really poorly. So the competition is meaningless. Non Western Europeans are competing with songs that would not do that well in their countries, compared to the popular songs that are better suited to their culture.
Instead of competition, Eurovision could be an event, where countries participate with songs they like the most. Contest is meaningless. Anti - NWO will never accept EU. Separation is a red line that can never be crossed. Anti - NWO will accept Eurovision as it is today. Nevertheless, separating Eurovision may be a very good idea. There could be Western Eurovision and Eastern Eurovision song contest.
Musical tastes in Western Europe are somewhat similar. The same is true in Eastern Europe. This is one more proof that there is no European family but two distinctive areas in Eurasian continent, Western and Eastern Europe. There could be a Eurovison song contest in Eastern Europe. Countries would send the songs they like and these songs could win because musical tastes are somewhat similar in Eastern Europe and different than Western Europe's.
Latin America Eurovision is being developed by Western Europeans. This is humiliating for Latin American countries. They should be able to organize their own competition. Western Europeans want to control everything, the whole world. Perhaps their goal is to prevail all over the world, like Hitler but using different means. Instead of using arms to prevail militarily, they use song competitions to prevail culturally.
Latin America should hold their own contest, not organized by Western Europeans. Other Groups could do the same, like Arab Group 5. It would be very interesting if there was an event, where the three top songs from each competition were presented. A contest would be meaningless because there is no comparison between different things.
If we have some apples, we can find which one is the best. Likewise, if we have a few oranges, we can find which among them is the best. If we take the best apple and the best orange, can we find which one is top? No, because apples and oranges are different and we can not compare them. We could not compare the three best songs from Latin America with the three best songs from Western Europe and the three best from Eastern Europe.
It would be very interesting to watch all of them but a contest would be meaningless. It would be like comparing the best apple, with the best orange, the best banana and the best peach. There is no comparison. The best apple was found compared to other apples but it can not be compared to the best orange, the best banana and the best peach.
Latin America countries do not participate in Eurovision contest. It is mostly Eastern European countries and countries which could participate in Eastern Europe's Group 4. They should make their own contest and send the songs that they like, which are similar to the popular songs. They should not choose their songs based on Western Europe's musical aesthetics and culture.