Flexibility vs rigidity

AntiNWO has only one red line in Europe, the division in two Groups. This is in accordance with two separate Groups in America, North and South-Central and all other Groups having roughly the same population. If there are not two groups in Europe, there can not be two Groups in America. It was mentioned that AntiNWO has very few red lines. In reality it is only one. AntiNWO has enormous flexibility while NWO extreme rigidity.

According to NWO's totally insane plan, there will be four pseudo-continental Unions, European, American, Asian, African. They will put them under a Global Dictatorship which they will control. The Unions are pseudo (fake) continental because Europe and Asia is one continent Eurasia. Oceania which is a distinct continent is included in Asian Union. Russia which is an integral part of Eastern Europe is placed in Asian Union.

NWO wants to enslave, suppress, exploit, deceive, brainwash people. There is something very wrong with NWO. These are very sick, confused and dangerous people. Their thinking is blurry and chaotic, caused by mental illness or drug use. They developed an organizational and economic model for EU which is a total disaster. EU is among the most stupid human creations. They want to implement this complete failure in the three other pseudo-continental Unions.

In NWO's grouping, there are big population differences between the Groups. Also there is extreme heterogeneity. At the same time, homogeneous groups are separated. One example is the placement of some Arab countries in African Union and the rest in Asian Union. Also Russia, an integral part of Eastern Europe is placed in Asian Union. AntiNWO has enormous flexibility. It has only one red line which is not even a red line.

AntiNWO's thinking is clear and organized. They created a much better grouping. It is not perfect but as good as it can get. AntiNWO's groups are roughly equal in terms of population. They are as homogeneous as possible. People are with similar people that think and behave in a similar way. Because of that, they can communicate and cooperate better. There is even more homogeneity created with Subgroups and Regions.

The first level of cooperation will be in Regions, the second in Subgroups and the third in the Groups. This is more orderly, organized and can be extremely helpful. There will also be relations between the Groups. Any two Groups can develop so close relations that they will be like one. Also, relations between countries in different groups will not be prohibited.

There will be a 10+2 Council for global matters only. It will not interfere in Group matters and Groups will not interfere in Subgroup matters. Subgroups will not interfere in Regional matters and Regions will not interfere in national matters. There is also the option for four coalitions of Groups. This is for the long term and it is only an option that does not have to happen.

Trading partners are also a very helpful feature. Trading partners will have similar trading privileges with members but they will not be part of decision making, the economic and organizational plan. They will be independent countries with preferential treatment. With the use of simple math, the Group's parliament, Europarliament in EU, is replaced by the aggregation of national parliaments.

The only requirement for participating in a Group is to have a Minister or Deputy Minister for the Group's Affairs. The Council of these ministers will do most of the work for the Groups, Subgroups and Regions. Employees working for the Groups' affairs will be spread in all countries and will be only a small fraction of what they are in EU.

In AntiNWO's superb plan there is no free movement of people, products, services and capital. Movement will be freed to the extend possible but not entirely. AntiNWO's plan has the minimum requirements for a succesful cooperation, mainly economic. If Groups want to do more, they can. But they should keep in mind that more is not always better.

These are only a few main points. There are many more explained in previous articles and even more that are not presented. Based on the organizational model and economic plan that are ready, AntiNWO will assist each Group to develop a unique organizational model and economic plan, according to the special circumstances in it. AntiNWO's organizational model and economic plan are very organized, well thought out, meticulous but also offer flexibility.

Although they are magnificent, AntiNWO does not impose them on Groups, like NWO does. These are optional. Groups can do whatever they want inside. Groups could use EU's disastrous economic plan and organizational model. But they shouldn't want to implement complete failures. They could also develop their own organizational model and economic plan. Both alternatives (EU's - own) are acceptable by AntiNWO.

The only red line AntiNWO has is to follow broadly the Groups presented because it is the best possible grouping. AntiNWO examined many different alternative groupings before coming up with the best. If some want to propose a better one, they can. But there is no better grouping because AntiNWO has already examined all other possibilities.

So ANTINWO's ONLY REAL RED LINE is to choose the BEST GLOBAL GROUPING. One that SOLVES PROBLEMS and PEOPLE SUPPORT. It is the one already presented. There can't be a better one because AntiNWO has already examined all possible groupings and this is THE BEST BY FAR. There is though some room for fine tuning. For instance, in Europe, there were a few options.

In the eastern part of Group 4, there were two alternatives. It would be either Turkiye or the rest of CIS countries, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. This matter has been settled. Turkiye will be in Group 8 with Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and play an important role in the Muslim world.

Syria and Lebanon could participate in Group 8. In the western part of Group 4, there are two possibilities also. Either German Wannabes (Poland, Czech Republic, Baltic countries) or Italy will participate. Both options are good and acceptable but the first is better. This matter has not been settled yet. "German Wannabes or Italy" choice also affects Group 3. If Italy will be in Group 4, German Wannabes will be in Group 3 and vice versa.

Israel's participation in Group 4 is something that needs to be settled as well. Trump will have to convince Russia not to oppose Israel's participation and give something in return. Cuba and some small Caribbean countries could participate in Group 1 with USA - Canada - Mexico. The composition of the two Subsaharan Groups 6 - 7 and the two Pacific Groups 9-10 remains to be settled.

Regardless of what NWO does, AntiNWO's superb plan will prevail because it is a winning position. It has huge support, more than 90%. At stake is the timing and the fate of NWO's vicious cabal. If NWO does not compromise, they could cause some delay but also this will have very big cost for them. All the horrible things they have done will be proven in court. Implementation of magnificent AntiNWO's plan is inevitable. Is it worth it for NWO's vicious cabal to spend the rest or their lives in jail, just to cause some delay?