Four possible Coalitions
Four possible Coalitions
We should try to build four Coalitions of Countries according to what was suggested in the three previous articles a) Coalitions of Countries b) Coalitions of Countries 2 c) Eastern Europe's Coaltion. Countries are added to Coalitions until their population reaches 25±1% of the world's. The four Coalitions are presented in Table A and Table B of Appendix 40.
We will start with the MOST OBVIOUS and MOST PRIVILEGED of all four Coalitions. Coalition A in Table A has most countries of Western Europe, Mercosur, India and Turkiye. Not all Western European countries are included. UK and Ireland are placed in Coalition C. Scandinavian countries, Finland, Austria (SFA) are placed in Coalition D. Scandinavian countries are Sweden, Norway, Denmark.
In EU, Western European countries and especially the largest ones (Germany, France, Italy, Spain) take the decisions. UK is not in EU anymore. Benelux (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxemburg) have also an imprtant role in decision making because they are founding members. Among the three Benelux countries, Netherlands has more important role because it is the largest of the three and the fifth largest among EU's Western European countries.
Coalitions A is TOTALLY JUSTIFIABLE with the two trade deals Western Europeans imposed on EU (with Mercosur and India). This is EXCACLTY WHAT Western Europe, Mercosur and India WANTED. They should be VERY HAPPY because they got what they wanted. Only little kids do not know what they want and this happens only sometimes, not always. These people are adults. Not only they are adults but they have very high positions.
It will also be a DREAM COME TRUE for Turkiye. They have been trying desparately, with no success, for forty years, since 1987 to be together with Western Europeans. This seemed almost impossible. UK's ex prime minister Cameron was very honest when he stated that this will not happen during the third millenium AD (till 3000). With Coalitions of Countries, it may be possible. In Turkiye they should celebrate frantically if it happens.
Coalition B in Table A of Appendix 40 has China with a) Taiwan, N. Korea, Mongolia b) Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon c) Nigeria, DR Congo, S. Africa. China has close relations with the three African countries. Instead of Nigeria, Pakistan could be included. The three African countries have a population of roughly 390 million. This is almost Western Europe's population and much more than Eastern's. China could pick other countries instead of the three African.
Coalition C in Table B of Appendix 40 has all the countries of the American continent, except Mercosur. UK and Ireland are also included. UK is not an EU member anymore and has closer relations with USA, compared to the rest of the Western European countries. Ireland is next to UK and has very good relations with USA as well. In USA, British (UK-Ireland) is the ancestry with the highest percentage. Also Ireland and UK are at the most Western end of Europe and closer to USA.
Coalition C has also Israel and most countries of the Arabian Peninsula, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrein, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar. Yemen is placed in Coalition B with Iran. Oman is not placed in any Coalition yet. There may be more Arab countries added because unlike Coalitions A and B, Coalition C is Incomplete. At the bottom or all Coalitions, total population and percentage of the world's population is shown. We use 2022 population data for consistency.
Coalition D in Table B of Appendix 40 has all Eastern European countries plus a) SFA (Scandinavia, Finland, Austria) b) Japan, S. Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Papua c) ACA (Azerbaijan and Central Asia). Central Asian countries are Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan. More countries will be added because unlike Coalitions A and B, Coalition D is Incomplete, like Coalition C. Coalition A has 26,1% and Coalition B 25,9% of the world's.
These two Coalitions are Complete (full). They already have 1% above 25%. The two other Coalitions will have 24%. So A and B do not get just 1% but 2% more than the other two Coalitions which is approximately 160 million. This is roughly the population of Russia+Greece+Finland. Coalitions A and B get as extra bonus the equivalent of Russia+Greece+Finland in population. Even if they do not have many countries, they are PRIVILEGED in terms of TOTAL POPULATION.
They do not have many countries because they have mostly large countries and mainly because India and China have enormous population. This is not the fault of the rest. That is why China has the largest economy (ppp) and India has the third largest. In the future, India's economy will be the second largest. This is the upside of having enormous population. But there is a downside too. In their Coalition there can't be too many countries because India and China have 17-18% of the world's population each.
The forty largest economies in purchasing power parity (ppp) are presented in Appendix 17. Coalition A has the 3rd, 6th, 7th, 9th, 11th, 12th, 15th largest economies. Coalition C has the 2nd, 10th, 13th, 16th, 18th. Coalition D has the 4th, 5th, 14th, 19th, 20th. Coalition B has only the 1st. They could include Indonesia (278 million people) which is the 8th lartest economy but they would have to get less African countries.
The two privileged Coalitions are A and B because they get the equivalent population of Russia+Greece+Finland more than the other two. Coalition A is the MOST PRIVILEGED of all because it has a lot more large economies, compared to the rest. It also has slightly above the acceptable range (26,1%), assuming that it will be 25±1%. So Western Europe and the countries in Coalition A should be very satisfied with their Coalition.
Since Coalitions A and B are more than full (above 25%), the rest of the countries will be placed in one of the two Coalitions that are Incomplete. So the rest of the countries that are not shown have only two choices, Coalition C or Coalition D. Coalition C will get approximately 12,5% (24-11,4) of the world's population while Coalition D will get roughly 15,5% (24-8,6) so that they will become Complete with 24%.
We should keep repeating and emphasizing that Coalitions are nothing like EU and NWO's Unions. Relations will be very much looser, compared to those in EU. There can be closer relations in divisions and subdivisions of Coalitions. These are highly recommended by AntiNWO but optional. Especially in Coalitions C and D that have many countries, divisions and subdivisions are absolutely necessary. Otherwise it will be total chaos.