Germanic-Celtic-Latin Union

Originally, the idea of European Union included only the Western part. It was during the Crusades that Western European countries formed a military alliance in order to conquer Jerusalem and the surrounding areas. At that time, in Eastern Europe there was Byzantine Empire and the state of Kievan Russes. The two states had developed very close political, economic, religious and cultural relations.

The temporary alliance that WESTERN EUROPEANS formed during the Crusades, initiated the idea of a more permanent cooperation that would include other areas in addition to military. When European Union started after World War II, the plan was to include only Western European countries. All Eastern European countries were in Eastern Bloc, except Hellas (Greece).

So in both the original plan and the plan after World War II, it would be a Union of only Western European countries. This is what AntiNWO is giving to Western Europeans. They can have their Union and they can do whatever they want inside. It is not only better for Eastern Europeans but also for Western Europeans and the whole world, if there are two separate Groups in Europe.

Separation will not be alienation. The two European Groups can make all kinds of agreements if these are mutually beneficial. They could develop very close relations and be like almost one group. Of course they are not obligated to do that. It is optional and close relations could be between any two groups, not just the two European groups. Also relations between countries in two different Groups will not be prohibited.

European Union is a Western European creation and a big mess. It is a huge disaster, a completely failed experiment. It is necessary and urgent to fix this big mess. Western Europeans will be in better position to fix the problems, if Eastern European countries spin off and form a separate Group with Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).

Even if they keep things as they are currently and make no changes, it will much better. It will be less income disparity and overall less heterogeneity. The countries that will be left in Western European Group 3, will be much closer in terms of income. Free movement of products, services, people, capital requires that countries are close in terms of competitiveness, productivity and income.

In Appendix 4 and Appendix 7, we can see the income of European and other countries. It is better to see Appendix 4, because the ranking includes all countries in Western and Eastern European Group. It also includes Turkiye because at the time this was posted, it was uncertain if Turkiye or Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan would be included in Eastern European Group 4. The numbers are in thousands.

It is evident that Eastern European countries have lower income. So when they spin off, the disparity of income would become smaller and only this will make Western European Group easier to function. NWO's lunatics, want to add to EU countries that have even lower income than the Eastern European countries that are already in it. Examples are Albania, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine. The situation will be even more chaotic, dysfunctional and uncontrollable than it is currently.

In addition to smaller income disparity, there will be less heterogeneity. They will be dealing with similar people. Most of Western European countries are Celtic and Germanic. People in Spain, Portugal, France, UK, Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands are mainly descendants of Celtic tribes. In Spain and Portugal, Celtiberians duelled before Roman conquest. In France there were Gauls and in British isles ancient Britons or Celtic Britons. All these were Celts.

Germanic tribes were in northern Germany, Denmark and the southern part of Sweden and Norway. People in these countries are mainly descendants of Germanic tribes. Germanic is divided in Saxonic (Germany) and Nordic (Scandinavia). Of course in many Celtic countries, there is considerable Germanic ancestry, since Germanic tribes moved towards south and west. In Germanic and Celtic countries, people are similar. They have racial, cultural and historical relations.

Spanish, Portuguese and Italians have little Germanic ancestry. Italians are not Celtic or Germanic but Latin. However, French, Spanish and Portuguese are Latin languages. France, Spain and Portugal are erroneously considered Latin countries. They are mainly Celtic, people originate from Celtic tribes. The only Latin country in the world is Italy. In addition to the similarities in language, Western European "Latin" countries have some cultural similarities.

Austria and Finland are also not Germanic or Celtic. Austria is racially closer to Eastern Europe but they speak German and their culture is probably closer to Germany's than to Eastern Europe's. In Finland, the main ancestry is Uralic which makes them racially closer to Eastern Europe. Secondary ancestry is Nordic which is Germanic. Culturally, they are probably closer to Western Europe. Also in terms of income, Austria and Finland belong in Western Europe.

Currently, EU has a population of roughly 450 million. The Eastern European countries that will spin off, have a population of 115 million. Sometime in the future, UK, Norway and Switzerland will be added to Western European Group 3. Together they have a population of 81 million. So there will be only a small difference in the population of Group 3 (roughly 420 million), compared to EU.

So even if they make no changes and leave things as they are, it would be much better for Western Europeans to have their own Germanic-Celtic-Latin Group. But they could and should make changes. It they want, they could adopt AntiNWO's superb organizational model. Even if they do not want to adopt all of it, they could add some of the features AntiNWO's far superior model has.

One very useful feature is trading partners. They have similar trading privileges with members but do not participate in decision making and the economic plan. They are independent countries which have preferential trading relations with the Group. So, UK, Norway and Switzerland could start as trading partners and some time in the future, they could become members. But this is not necessary. They could remain trading partners for ever.

Another useful feature is subgroups. It is shown In the Table below how the two Subgroups could be. SubGroup A is more in the South and has a population of 207 million. Subgroup B is more in the North and has a population of 211 million. In Subgroup A, they speak mainly Latin languages and in Subgroup B mainly Germanic languages. Subgroups make things more orderly. They could decide the degree of autonomy subgroups will have. They could make even further division with Regions.

Europarliament is not only a total waste of taxpayers' money but also very unflexible. With the use of some simple math, national parliaments can constitute Western Europarliament. It will save taxpayers' money and be much more flexible. Of course, there are more features, Western Europeans could adopt from AntiNWO's superb organizational model.

The problem is Western European NWO. They are a problem for Western Europe, Eastern Europe and the whole world. Instead of dealing with the problems their citizens have, they constantly interfere in Eastern Europe, causing problems, conflicts and wars. Instead of slimming down the Group to only Western European countries, they want to expand it and make it more chaotic, dysfunctional and uncontrollable.

There is a solution to the problem. Western European citizens should vote out all NWO lunatics and replace them with AntiNWO political parties and politicians. In this way, AntiNWO's superb plan can be implemented. It will be much better for Western Europe, Eastern Europe and the whole world. NWO's big mess will be fixed. All problems will be solved, all wars will end and there will be peace and prosperity all over the world.

Germanic-Celtic-Latin Union 2

History of NWO   Byzantium was not Roman   Hellenes, Thracians, Illyrians 1   No European family   Two Europes   European tribes’ mix   Ural-Altaic tribes   Two European poles