Two and three Groups 

In the previous article, we assumed that relations between M3 (Iran) and M2 will not get bad because of the war. Suppose that this does not happen. A two-Groups M (Muslim) Subcoalition could be M1-M3. M2 is between M1 and M3 but they are not far away. Only Iraq is between M1 and M3. Spatial (geographic) proximity is preferable but not necessary in Subcoalitions.

M2 (Turkiye, Saudi Arabia etc) will be with Western European Group E1. Again, these two Groups are not next to each other but the distance between them is not too long. That would be a dream come true for Turkiye. Since 1987, they have been trying to be together with Western Europe. The other Subcoalitions will remain as in the previous case. So the eight Subcoalitions will be A1-A2, A3-R4, E2-R1, E1-M2, M3-M1, R2-R3, S1-S2, S3-S4.

Even if it is not very likely, we will present one case where E2 is with E1. South American Group A3 is much closer to Africa than to Oceania. So A3-M1 can be one Subcoalition. The two remaining M (Muslim) Groups will form Subcoalition M2-M3. E2 will be with E1 and R1 with R4. The other four will remain the same. All eight Subcoalitions will be A1-A2, A3-M1, M2-M3, E1-E2, R1-R4, R2-R3, S1-S2, S3-S4.

E1 can be with E2, only if Western European NWO supports AntiNWO's plan. This is not very likely to happen. These people are fanatics. They will stop supporting NWO's plan only when they die. Voters in Western and Eastern Europe should know that the ONLY reason EUROPEAN SUBCOALITION E1-E2 will NOT HAPPEN is Western European NWO's MANIC OBSESSION with a highly defective plan from the Dark Ages that has failed tremendously.

So what will happen with Western European Group E1? A possible scenario is to be in a Subcoalition with Southern American Group A3. This can be the Subcoalition that will be added to India's Coalition. They were asking for something like that when they made the two trade deals, EU-Mercosur and EU-India. Those two deals were really insignificant because EU will cease to exist.

However, they could be extremely significant in determining the Coalition India, Mercosur and Western Europe will be in. Because of the two trade deals that were made, it is very possible that I-E1-A3 will be one Coalition and E1-A3 a two-Groups Subcoalition. Suppose that E1-A3 is a Subcoalition. We will examine a scenario of forming two-Groups Subcoalitions with the other Groups.

Without China, the rest of the Groups are fourteen; A1, A2, E2, M1, M2, M2, S1, S2, S3, S4, R1, R2, R3, R4. They should make seven two Groups-Subcoalitions. One can be A1-A2. E2 could form a Subcoalition with M1 or M3. The other two M (Muslim) Groups will be in another Subcoalition, M2-M3 or M1-M2. The four S (Subsaharan) Groups will form two Subcoalitions and the four R (Rest of Asia plus Oceania) two more.

So the eight two-Groups Subcoalitions could be A1-A2, A3-E1, E2-M1, M3-M2, R1-R4, R2-R3, S1-S2, S3-S4. There are three American Groups, A1, A2, A3. If there are only two-Groups Subcoalitions, one of the three Groups will have to be in a Subcoalition with a non-A (American) Group that is an ocean apart. EU - Mercosur makes things easier because it justifies A3-E1 Subcoalition. That will be the only Subcoalition that does not have geographical (spatial) proximity.

In Appendix 31, several three-Groups Subcoalitions were presented. Forming Subcoalitions must be done in such a way that there is no overlapping, there are no common Groups in the Subcoalitions. In China's and India's Coalition there can be only a two-Groups Subcoalition added. So, there would be at least two two-
Groups Subcoalitions that will have 2X2=4 Groups.

The remaining of the Groups (without China and India) will be 16-4=12. These will form two Coalitions with six Groups each. A Coalition can have two three-Groups Subcoalitions or three two-Groups Subcoalitions. There are three options a) both Coalitions will have two three-Groups Subcoalitions b) both Coalitions will have three two Groups Subcoalitions c) one Coalition will have two three-Groups Subcoalition and the other three two-Groups Subcoalitions.

So the remaining twelve Groups will form a) four three-Groups Subcoalitions (4X3=12) b) six two-Groups Subcoalitions (6X2=12) c) two three-Groups Subcoalitions and three two-Groups Subcoalitions (2X3+3X2=12). A1-A2-A3 and M1-M2-M3 are obvious choices for three-Groups Subcoalitions. The remaining 16-6=10 Groups can form two and three Groups Subcoalitions.

There are only two possibilities a) five two-Groups Suboalitions 5X2=10 b) two three-Groups and two two-Groups Subcoalitions (2X3+2X2=10). The remaining Groups are E1, E2, R1, R2, R3, R4, S1, S2, S3, S4. One way is to have the two E (European) Groups form a Subcoalition, the four R (Rest of Asia and Oceania) form two Subcoalitions and the four S (Subsaharan) form two more Subcoalitions. But there are many other ways. What if we want the second choice (2X3+2X2=10)?

E1-E2-R1 and R2-R3-R4 are two possible three-Groups Subcoalitions. We demonstrated that there can be a mix of two and three Groups Coalitions but these do not offer many choices. If A1-A2-A3 and M1-M2-M3 are the only three-Groups Subcoalitions, they have to be together in a Coalition. This will be very awkward because M1-M2-M3 area is the most anti-USA in the world. Also that Coalition has a large part of the world's gas and oil resourses and the rest of the Groups will oppose it.

Suppose that there are four three-Groups Subcoalitions, A1-A2-A3, M1-M2-M3, E1-E2-R1, R2-R3-R4. That gives three choices for forming Coalitions; a) A1-A2-A3 with M1-M2-M3 and E1-E2-R1 with R2-R3-R4. b) A1-A2-A3 with E1-E2-R1 and M1-M2-M3 with R2-R3-R4 c) A1-A2-A3 with R2-R3-R4 and E1-E2-R1 with M1-M2-M3. But S1, S2, S3, S4 can be only in China's or India's Coalition.

A mix of three-Groups and two-Groups Subcoalitions is possible but has limitations. On the other hand, having only two-Groups Subcoalitions has a lot more flexibility and offers many more choices. Any Subcoalition can be added to China's or India's Coalition. Also any three Subcoalitions can be in the other two Coalitions. So only two-Groups Subcoalitions are preferable but a mix of three-Groups and two-Groups is possible.

We have presented four alternatives of forming eight two-Groups Coalitions. There are TWO MILLION TWENTY SEVEN THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE (2.027.021) MORE ALTERNATIVES. Geographic proximity is not required. Forming eight two-Groups Subcoalitions is only the first part. The second part is to use these Subcoalitions as building blocks for Coalitions.

We will take the first of the cases that we presented; 1) A1-A2 2) A3-R4 3) E2-R1 4) E1-M1 5) M3-M2 6) R2-R3 7) S1-S2 8) S3-S4. Two of them will complete China's and India's Coalition. There are 8X7=56 ways to form those two Coalitions. The remaining Subcoalitions will be 8-2=6. There are ten (10) ways the six remaining Subcoalitions can form two more Coalitions.

So the total number of possible Coalitions is 56X10=560 FIVE HUNDRED and SIXTY. This is only for one case of forming eight two-Groups Subcoalitions with the sixteen Groups. The total number of all possible combinations of Coalitions is 560X2.027.025 = 1.135.134.000 ONE BILLION ONE HUNDRED and THIRTY FIVE MILLION ONE HUNDRED and THIRTY FOUR THOUSAND!