Basis for changes 2
Basis for changes 2
Turkiye's stance is confusing. They are a NWO stronghold but they want to change NWO's plan. Turkiye wants to be in European Union while in NWO's plan, it is clearly in Asian Union. It gets even more confusing. Eventhough they want to be in European Union, at the same time they want to have an important role in the Muslim countries. In NWO's plan, most of Muslim countries are in Asian Union in which Turkiye does not want to participate.
Since Turkey is a NWO stronghold, it could be placed together with Western Europe which is the main NWO stronghold. Option 5 (Appendix 41) is based on Option 4. The only difference is that Turkiye is in Coalition A and Scandinavia - Finland - Austria (SFA) are in Coalition D. The percentages are A 25,7%, B 25,3%, C25,1%, D 24,0%. Turkiye could be in three Coalitions, A, B, D. The best placement seems to be in B that has many Muslim countries.
In Option 6, Turkiye (TR), Scandinavia - Finland - Austria (SFA), North Africa (NAF) are in D. Mercosur+ (SAM) is in A. The percentages are A 25,9%, B 25,3%, C 25,1% and D 23,8%. In Option 7 (Appendix 41B), North Africa (NAF) and Middle East (ME) are together in Coalition A. This is very unlikely to happen but not entirely impossible. Turkiye (TR) is in Coalition A. Scandinavia - Finland - Austria (SFA) and Mercosur+ (SAM) are in D.
Muslim African countries (MAF) are in C together with the rest of Subsaharan Africa. This is also unlikely to happen but not impossible. The percentages are A 25,5%, B 25,5%, C 25,1%, and D 24,0%. Option 8 is based on Option 7. SFA goes to A, TR to D and MAF to B. The percentages are A 26,0%, B 25,3%, C 24,2% and D 24,6%. Otpion 9 is also based on Option 7.
The only difference is that North Africa (NAF) and Middle East (ME) are in Coalition D while Mercosur+ (SAM) is in Coalition A. This is unlikely to happen but not impossible. The percentages are A 25,9%, B 25,5%, C 25,1% and D 23,6%. Option 10 is based on Option 9. North Africa (NAF) and Middle East (ME) move to Coalition C. Coalition D gets a part in Subsaharan Africa around 350 million. The percentages are A 25,9%. B 25,5%. C 24,4% and D 24,3%.
North Africa (NAF) and the four MAF countries (Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti, Comoros) are not very friendly towards Israel and USA. The most friendly countries are included in ME and are the six countries of the Arab Peninsula. So having NAF and MAF together with Israel and USA in the same Coalition would be problematic but it is not entirely impossible. Presenting an option does not mean that it has good chances to happen.
In Option 11, Subsaharan Africa is divided into four parts and each Coalition gets one. Coalition A gets a part with population around 250 million (SAF1). The part Coalition D gets (SAF3) has roughly 300 people. The rest which is roughly 609 million remains in C. Coalition B has the four MAF countries (Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti, Comoros). The percentages are A 24,9%, 25,3%, 25,1%, 24,7%. All four are close to 25%.
Option 12 is based on Option 11. Coalition C gets ASEAN (AS) and Coalition D South America (SAM) and North Africa (NAF). Since the population of ASEAN is higher than SAM+NAF, the percentage of Coalition C in Subsaharan Africa decreases while that of Coalition D increases. The percentages of the four Coalitions are A 24,9%, B 25,3%, C 24,8%, D 25,0%. They are all very close to 25% which is ideal. This seems as a good option as well.
If Turkiye is in B, the percentage of D in Subsaharan Africa will increase. Some people believe that it is preferable if ASEAN is in Coalition D with Eastern Pacific (EP) and Rest of Asia (RA). However others think that it is better if ASEAN is in Coalition C. Dividing Subsaharan Africa into four parts is also something many people like very much. Each Coalition gets one part. If China and Coalition B want a bigger part in Subsaharan Africa, they would have to "sacrifice" some countries.
There are really endless changes that can be made. We can't present all of them. But there are certain limitations on the modifications. Obviously, Israel can't be with Iran or Turkiye. That can never happen. Israel is in ME (Middle East) area. So ME can't be with Turkiye or Iran. Also it is better if Turkiye is not with Balkan countries. Balkans are in Eastern Europe. So, it is preferable if Turkiye is not with Eastern Europe but this could happen.
Evidently 1) USA (US) and North Atlantic (NAT) 2) Western Europe (WE) 3) Eastern Europe (EE1 and EE2) 4) China (C) will be separately because they are the four most advanced areas and the four poles that will gather the rest of the countries. China does not have so high per capita income but it is very advanced technologically and has economic strenght since it is the largest economy (ppp).
According to a different reasoning, India and not Western Europe should be fourth pole because India is currently the third largest economy (ppp) and in the future, it will be the second. But there is no problem because WESTERN EUROPE will certainly BE WITH INDIA. They can decide if one of them or both are the poles. WESTERN EUROPE and INDIA will be a VERY STRONG PARTNERSHIP.
Mercosur+ can also be added. Howver, Mercosur+ could be placed in another Coalition, C or D. EE1 will definitely be with EE2. There is no question about that. It is almost certain that Eastern Pacific (EP), Japan, S. Korea, Australia, N. Zealand, Papua, will also be included. Eastern Europe is not so advanced like North America (USA, Canada) and Western Europe.
Also, Eastern Europe does not have the economic strength of China and North America (USA). But together with Eastern Pacific, it becomes stronger economically. Eastern Pacific is also advanced, perhaps more than Eastern Europe. In many sectors (transportation etc), Japan and S. Korea have better systems than Western Europe and North America. EASTERN PACIFIC is a very GOOD MATCH with EASTERN EUROPE.
It is possible that SFA (Scandinavia, Finland, Austria) will also participate in Coalition D. They have high per capita income and are advanced but are small countries. If SFA are not in Coalition C with Eastern Europe, they will be with Western Europe in Coalition A. In Coalition D, they will be independent and have an important role. In Coalition A, they will be Germany's satelite states and have an insignificant role.
ASEAN can be in Coalition D but it can also be in Coalition C. In this way, there is a better mix from different parts of the world in Coalitions C and D. Also Subsaharan Africa can be divided into four parts. Not only all Coalitions get a part from Subsaharan Africa but also all can help the poorest area in the world to develop. Decision makers should make a choice. If they can't agree, they can use DMPR or RLS.