Plan B2 grouping cases

In NWO's highly malfunctioning plan, grouping is specific. There will be four Unions, European, African, Asian, American. In AntiNWO's Plan A, grouping is also specific in the broad guidelines. There will be 10+2 Groups. There is room for fine tuning though. In AntiNWO's Plan B and Plan B2, grouping is not specific. Decision makers will have to decide about grouping.

We will sum up cases presented in previous articles for Plan B2, add some more and explain them a little better. Due to the Bunny effect, Mexico, Cuba or any Latin American country can't be in North American Group. A possible Grouping is presented in Talbe A of Appendix 28. It is the same as the one in Appendix 18 which had an example of seven possible Groups in Plan B.

Greenland will also be in North American Group and perhaps Iceland. Their populations are small. Greenland has around fifty six (56) thousand and Iceland around three hundred and eighty (380) thousand people. So when they are added, total population of North American Group will not change much. Although in Plan B2 there is no population range, only an upper limit, North America's Group could set the standard size of Groups.

If this happens, Europe will be divided into two Groups as shown in Table A of Appendix 26 and Muslim countries in three Groups as shown in Table A of Appendix 27. Europe is where the main problem exists regarding grouping because there is already EU and Western European NWO insists with manic obsession on a highly defective plan from the Dark Ages that has failed enormously.

In Appendix 18, Europe is divided into two Groups. We will look into that option later. First let's look at the option of Table A in Appendix 26. Austria and Scandinavian countries (Finland included) are together with Eastern European countries. Austria is geographically in Eastern Europe and genetically (racially) between Western and Eastern, perhaps closer to Eastern. Finland and Sweden are geographically in Eastern Europe. Norway and Denmark are in Western.

We will explain in next article whether this division is possible. In this article, we only present various alternatives, without evaluating their chances. Suppose that Denmark is together with the rest of Western European countries. This would change the populations of western and eastern Group to 387,7 and 364,5 million respectively. If Norway is also in western Group, the populations would become 393,2 and 359 million.

Still, the population difference between the two European Groups is not big. Nevertheless, there is a country that could be added to eastern and bring the populaitons more even. Although mostly Muslim, Kazakhstan is in seventh place regarding Orthodox Christian population, after Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Greece, Belarus, Serbia. Kazakhstan also has closer relations with Russia, compared to the rest of Central Asian countries.

Kazakhstan has much higher per capita income than the rest of Central Asian countries. According to IMF, it is very close to Latvia's and Greece's, above Bulgaria's. An option would be to add Kazakhstan to the eastern European Group. In the two Groups division that we examined above, with Kazakhstan, the population of eastern Group becomes roughly three hundred and eighty (380) million, if only Sweden and Finland participate.  

Preferably, ACA (Azerbaijan, Central Asia) would be together in a Group. But this is not necessary. Likewise, preferably, Scandinavian countries (Finland included) would be together in one Group. Again, this is not necessary. Denmark could be in one Group and the rest in another. Or Denmark and Norway that are in Western Europe can be in western Group, while Swedern and Finland that are geographically in Eastern Europe could be in eastern Group.

In Table A of Appendix 29, possible Subgroups and Regions are presented for the two Group division of Table A - Appendix 26. In Table B, an alternative division of Europe in two Groups is shown, with Subgroups and Regions. Italy is with Eastern European countries. It is similar with the one in Appendix 18. The difference is that in Table B of Appendix 29, Czechia and Baltic countries are in western Group, in order to bring the populations of the two Groups more even.

Appendix 20 shows two alternatives for having two Subgroups in the two Group division of Appendix 18. In Table B, Subgroup 5B is Orthodox. It is like the one in Table B of Appendix 26, (three Group division), without Ukraine. If we add Ukraine in Subgroup 5B of Table B - Appendix 20, we get the third, eastern Group  in Table B - Appendix 26. Ukraine is an Orthodox country.

Europe's division into three Groups is shown in Table B of Appendix 26 and Appendix 19.Table B of Appendix 19 is very similar with Table B of Appendix 26. The difference is that Bosnia and Albania are in eastern Group (in Appendix 19). In Table A of Appendix 19, the eastern Group 3 remains the same (as in Table B) but the two other Groups, 1 and 2, change. In Table A, France is with Italy (not UK) and Germany with UK (not Italy).

Europe's division into four Groups can be very easily derived from the Subgroups of the two Group division. If the four Subgroups of Appendices 20 and 29 become Groups, we get a four Group division. So far, in European Groups, only two small Christian countries were included that are at the borders of Europe and Asia, Georgia and Armenia. More Asian countries could be included.

In AntiNWO's Plan A, ACA (Azerbaijan - Central Asia) are included in Eastern European Group. The Subgroups of Eastern Group are in Appendix 11 and of Western Group in Appendix 15. In Table A of Appendix 11, Hungary and Slovakia are in Region A1 while in Table B they are in Greco-Thraco-Illyrian Region A2. In Table C, Israel is not included in Region A2.

Appendix 15 presents the Subgroups of Western European Group. Table A has the North - South division and Table B the East - West. Table C presents the Subgroups of Western European Group with Italy - German Wannabes swap. Table A of Appendix 14 presents the Subgroups of both European Groups, with Italy - German Wannabes swap.

Table B of Appendix 14 presents an alternative for dividing Subgroup 4A into two Regions, 4A1 and 4A2. Again, there can be a four Group division of Europe with the addition of ACA. If SubGroups, become Groups in Appendix 11, Appendix 14 and Appendix 15, there will be four Groups. If Subgroups become Groups, Regions will become Subgroups.

Table C of Appendix 19 has Muslim countries. It is somewhat similar with Table B of Appendix 27. Pakistan - Afghanistan Group is not presented in this table. The composition of the three other Groups is different. This is another way to divide the Muslim countries of North Africa, Southwestern and Central Asia into four Groups, if we add also Pakistan - Afghanistan Group.

There are endless alternatives for grouping in Plan B and B2. We can't present all of them. These were just a few cases. AntiNWO's decision makers will choose one of the very many options. NWO's supporters will not participate in decision making, for as long as they support the highly defective plan from the Dark Ages. If they want to participate in decision making, they should renounce NWO's complete failure.