Size and number in Plan B2

Both NWO's plan and AntiNWO's Plan A are specific regarding the grouping. NWO's plan has four Unions. AntiNWO's Plan A has 10+2 Groups. Grouping in AntiNWO's Plan A is specific in the broad guidelines but there is room for fine tuning. There is an effort to have roughly equal populations in the ten Groups. Since it is impossible to have exactly equal populations, there is a range.

In Plan B, decision makers will have to decide about the grouping. There is a range for the Groups' populations, for instance 300 to 400 million. The building blocks of Coalitions are Groups. No country can participate in a Coalition. It has to be in a Group and that Group will be in a Coalition. The only exceptions are India and China that have enormous population.

Plan B2 is a more flexible variation of Plan B. There is no range but only an upper limit. Also countries can participate in Coalitions, without being in a Group. A range has a lower and an upper limit. In Plan B2, the lower limit is 0. Of course, there is no country with 0 population but there can be Groups with low total population that is close to 1 million.

In southeastern Europe, if N. Macedonia and Montenegro formed a Group, the population would be 2,45 million (Appendix 30). In the Caribbean, if Bahamas, Barbados, Saint Lucia, Grenada, Saint Vincent, Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Saint Kits formed a Group, the population would be 1,3 million (Appendix 30). There are many people in AntiNWO who believe that the lower limit should be much higher than 0.

Is it possible to have a range in population and at the same time allow countries to participate in Coalitions, without being in Groups? Yes, it is possible. Plan B2 is not written on stone. In Plan B, smaller range results in more eveness but larger gives more flexibility. The same can be done in Plan B2. If decision makers want more flexibility, they can make the range larger.

We should keep in mind that unlike in NWO's plan, AntiNWO's offers further division in Groups with Subgroups and Regions. So if some countries want to have a group that has relatively small population, it can be a Subgroup or a Region. This is shown in Appendix 29. If we look at Table A, A1 and A2 are Subgroups of A, B1 and B2 are Subgroups of B. B1a and B1b are Regions in Subgroup B1.

In Appendix 29, Groups are in the range 350 - 400 million in both tables A and B. In Table A of Appendix 28, the three Groups are in the range 300 - 400 million. So are the three Groups in Table A of Appendix 27. But in Table B or Appendix 27, Table B of Appendix 28 and Table B of Appendix 26, the lower limit is almost 250 (240) million. In Appendices 27-28, there can be minor changes to bring all Groups above 250 million.

In Appendix 30, Western European Group will have above 400 (418) million, if Scandinavia - Finland are included. Without them, it will be below 400 (391) million. Also Eastern European Group will have above 400 (426) million, if ACA (Azerbaijan - Central Asia) are included. A possible range that seems reasonable is 300 to 400 million. The difference between upper and lower limit is 100 million. If the range is 250 to 450 million, the difference is double, 200 million.

China and India have 35% of the world's population. The rest have 65% or 5,2 billion, since the world's population is 8 billion. Those 5,2 billion will be divided in a number of Groups. In Plan A, North American Group is around half a billion and sets the standard size. Nevertheless, for various reasons, it is not possible to have all Groups with the same size. In Plan A, there are 10 Groups, without China and India.

In Plans B and B2, the size of the Groups will be smaller than in Plan A. So there will be more Groups. Suppose that North American Group sets the standard size. How many Groups should there be? In Appendix 30, we see that the North American Group will have 376 million. If the average size of the Group is around 375 million, there should be 14 Groups (without India and China).

In the Table above, we show the number of Groups and the average size of a Group (without China and India). In Appendix 30, the average size of the three American Groups is (376+318+326) / 3 = 340 million. This grouping can't change because there are no other countries near, only two oceans. If the average size is around 340 (347) million, the number of Groups is fifteen (15). If the Groups are twenty (20), the average size is 260 million.

Lets's look at Appendices 26, 27 and 28. Appendix 26 has European countries, Western and Eastern. Appendix 27 has the Muslim countries of North Africa, Southwestern and Central Asia. Appendix 28 has the American continent. Total populations are seven hundred and fifty two million (752.292.039), one billion twenty one million (1.021.220.567) and one billion nineteen million (1.019.033.385) respectively.

If we divide 1.019.033.385 by 3 we get 340 (339.677.795) which is the average size of a Group in the American continent. If we have two Groups in Europe, the average size is 752.292.039 / 2 = 376.146.020. The two Groups of Table A in Appendix 26 are close to the number. If the number of Groups is three, the average size is 752.292.039 / 3 = 250.764.013. All the Groups in Table B of Appendix 26 are very close to that number.

In the same manner, we find the average size of the Muslim countries in Appendix 27. It is three hundred and forty million (340.406.8556) and two hundred fifty five million (255.305.142) with three and four Groups respectively. What is the average Group size of all countries in Appendices 26-28? It is three hunderd forty nine million (349.068.249) million, if the Groups are eight as shown in Tables A of the three Appendices 26-28. All the Groups will be fifteen, as shown in the table above.

SMALLER GROUPS can FUNCTION BETTER and can be MORE HOMOGENEOUS. If Groups are smaller, they can have CLOSER RELATIONS among them. If Groups are smaller, their number increases. This makes the relations among them more complex. Nevertheless, in Plan B and B2 this is not a problem because Coalitions are required. There can also be Subcoalitions that are optional.

There are not only Groups. There can be further divisions inside the Groups with Subgroups and Regions. Coalitions are a requirement. They should have roughly equal population. Each Coalition should have roughly one quarter of the world's population. Currently, this is eight billion. So each Coalition should have two billion people, with today's population.

Bottom line is that there are ways to find solutions in what seems to many people a very complex problem. DECISION MAKERS will need the ASSISTANCE of EXPERTS in DATA ANALYSIS that MUST BE AntiNWO SUPPORTERS. They KNOW their JOB and for them it is VERY EASY. They can use methods a lot more sophisticated than those we have presented. Obviously, a seminar in data analysis is beyond the scope of this website.