Acceptable range

Recently, Western European NWO imposed two trade deals on EU, one with Mercosur and the other with India. In NWO's ridiculous plan there is no Mercosur, only American Union. Also there is no India, only Asian Union. On the other hand, there is NO EU in any of AntiNWO's superb PLANS (A, B, B2). But there is western European Group, Mercosur+ and India.

Can there be a Coalition consisting of western European Group, Mercosur+ and India? We answer this and other questions in Appendix 31. We name the three American Groups shown in Appendix 30  or Table A of Appendix 28, A1, A2 and A3 (ll. 1-3). In the same manner, the two European Groups of Table A in Appendix 26 are E1 and E2 (ll. 5-6). The three Muslim Groups of Table A in Appendix 27 are M1, M2, M3 (ll. 8-10). 

The total population or all these Groups is 2,8 b (2.794 million) which is almost 35 (34,9) % of the world's population. China and India have 2.837 million which is 35,5% of the world's total. China and India together have more population than all the American continent, all Europe and the Muslim countries of North Africa, Southwestern and Central Asia!

The other 2,4 billion ( 2.369 million) which is roughly 30 (29,6)% is in Subsaharan Africa, the rest of Asia and Oceania. In 2022, all Africa's population was 1,45 billion. North Africa had around 300 million, including Sudan and Somalia. So Subsaharan Africa (S) had around 1,15 billion or 14,4%. The rest in Asia and Oceania (R) had around 1,22 billion or 15,2%. These are rough, not precise estimates.

Column 2 of Table A in Appendix 31 shows populations rounded in millions and column 3 percentages of the world's population. Column 4 has Coalitions and Subcoalitions. In Column 5 are their populations and in Column 6 their percentage of the world's total. A Coalition should have one fourth of the world's population which is 25% and a Subcoaltion half of this which is 12,5%. However, it is IMPOSSIBLE to get PRECISELY these PERCENTAGES.

An ACCEPTABLE RANGE should be set. For instance, it could be ±2 or ±3 for Coalitions and ±1 or ±1,5 for Subcoalitions. The smaller the range, the more even Coalitions and Subcoalitions will be. So let's take the smaller ranges, ±2 for Coalitions and ±1 for Subcoalitions. Coalitions should be between 23% and 27% while Subcoalitions between 11,5% and 13,5%.

We should not forget that in NWO's ULTRA RIDICULOUS PLAN, the POPULATION percentages of the FOUR UNIONS have HUGE DIFFERENCES. According to a rough quick estimation, the percentages of world's population are; a) European 7,5%, b) American 12,5% c) African 17,5% d) Asian 62,5%. The range is 62,5 - 25 = 37,5! There is an obvious quention. What KIND of RIDICULOUS people can THINK of such a PLAN? People in the DARK AGES that had VERY LIMITED KNOWLEDGE! 

There is another question that comes to someone's mind. What KIND of RIDICULOUS PEOPLE can SUPPORT such a PLAN TODAY? The answer is very easy. Only very IGNORANT and SILLY people can support such a plan! All NWO's SUPPORTERS are SILLY IGNORANT people that pretend to be serious and knowledgable while they are not. They are only playing a role. Nobody should take NWO's supporters seriously.

The first line in Column 4 is I-E1-A3, India - western European Group - Mercosur+. The third American Group A3 (in Table A of Appendix 28 or Appendix 30) is Mercosur plus Bolivia, Chile, Peru. Total population of the Coalition I-E1-A3 is 2.133 million which is 26,7% of the world's population. It is in the range 23 - 27%. So with a range ±2 for Coaltions, there can be a COALITION consisting of INDIA, WESTERN EUROPEAN GROUP and MERCOSUR+!

Western Europeans will not participate in decision making because they are NWO's supporters. Probably India and Mercosur should not participate either because with the two deals, they sent the message that they side with western European NWO that is the main supporter of NWO's ridiculous plan. Perhaps, decision makers should PLACE them TOGETHER in a COALITION because it seems that they WANT to BE TOGETHER, after the two deals they made.

Two more options for India's Coalitions follow and then three for China's. Next are three Subcoalitions for the North American Group. The first one is American Subcoalition. The three American Groups are in one Subcoalition, A1-A2-A3 (l. 9). Next are three options for western European Group E1, followed by three for eastern European Group E2. These are shown INDICATIVELY and were chosen RANDOMLY.

The number of all possible combinations is very large, thousands. Almost all of the options shown fall with in the range, ±2 for Coalitions and ±1 for Subcoalitions. Only A1-E1-E2 Subcoalition has 14,1% (l. 11) which is above the upper limit 13,5%. In order for that Subcoalition to happen, the range must be set higher. With a range ±1,5 for Subcoalitions, it is only slightly above the upper limit 14% and that could be acceptable by decision makers.

We can observe that all the Coalitions are above 25% and all Subcoaltions above 12,5%. Why is that? In the options we presented in Table A of Appendix 31, there are two more Groups in India's and China's Coalition and three total in Subcoaltions. If this pattern if followed, the four Coalitions will be; a) India + 2 Groups b) China + 2 Groups c) 6 Groups d) 6 Groups. So the total number of Groups will be 16 + 2 = 18.

The average population size of the eight Groups (A1, A2, A3, E1, E2, M1, M2, M3) in Tables A of Appendixes 26, 27, 28 is 349 billion. A table that has number of Groups and average population size was shown in two previous articles, (Size and number in Plan B2 - Plan B2 clarifications). As it can be seen in that table, if the average size remains the same for all Groups, around 347 million, there should be 15 not 16 Groups, without India and China.

If there are 16 Groups, the average size becomes 325 million. Since we have already 8 Groups (A1, A2, A3, E1, E2, M1, M2, M3), 8 more are needed to become 16. So in Subsaharan Africa, the rest of Asia and Oceania, there should be 16 - 8 = 8 more Groups. These should be smaller than the 8 that we show in Appendix 31, in order to bring the average population size of Groups down from 349 to 325 million.

This can be also understood by the fact that the 8 Groups presented (A1, A2, A3, E1, E2, M1, M2, M3) have 35% of the world's population while Subsaharan Africa (S) and the rest of Asia plus Oceania (R) have 30%. If there are 16 Groups, the 8 Groups that we have not presented (S-R) will be on the average smaller than the eight shown in Appendix 31. Their average population size will be around 300 million.

So the Coalitions and Subcoaltions which contain one or more of these Groups may have lower percentages but most likely these will be within the acceptable range. Although the GROUPING in Appendix 31 seems VERY GOOD, there can be many other ways. Decision makers will need the assistance of experts in data analysis. They will be able to get the numbers right, according to the directions they have from decision makers.