Separation is not alienation

Separation between Eastern and Western Europe is a red line that can not be crossed. There are reasons for this. Separation is better for all, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, all other groups. In addition, separation does not have to be alienation. There will be several agreements among all groups. The two groups could make agreements in a way that will determine how close their relations would be.

Eastern Europe has lower per capita income compared to Western. It should have much higher growth rates but this opportunity is lost when they are in the same group with Western European countries. If they form a separate group, they could reach Western Europe in terms of per capita income in even as soon as 10-15 years. Eastern Europe's economic take off is only possible in a separate group.

EU is a Western European malfunctioning creation. The organizational model is extremely deficient. In order to make it work, countries should have approximately equal per capita income. Poorer countries are less competitive because they have lower productivity. So participation in EU is a lose situation for them. They lose, they do not benefit. Convergence is a deception, in reality the opposite happens.

The smaller income disparity is, the less problematic EU's disastrous model will be. Portugal is Western Europe's poorest country. Most Eastern European countries are even below Portugal, in terms of per capita income. So, if Eastern Europe will be in a separate group, income disparity will be smaller and the situation more manageable. The model would still be flawed and the problem will remain but it would be much smaller.

Albania, North Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia, Moldova, Ukraine, Belarus, Russia are Eastern European countries that are not in EU. Belarus and Russia would probably never participate. For the rest, participation in EU would be a very long procedure that could take many years or even decades. Participation in Eastern European group is immediate.

It is a very different mentality, approach and organizational model. The only requirement for participating countries is to have a Ministry or Deputy Ministry for the Group's affairs. The main goal is economic cooperation and the benefits derived for all countries. This can be accomplished in a very different and much better way, compared to EU's failed model.

As it has been explained, there is no Europe but two distinctive areas in Eurasian continent, Western and Eastern Europe. These two areas are relatively homogeneous compared to whole Europe. Still there are small differences between areas in Western and Eastern Europe. These could be dealt with regions (prefectures, provinces) inside the two groups, as in any other groups.

Separating Eastern and Western Europe is better for other groups as well. If Western and Eastern Europe are together, Northern, Central and Southern America would have to be together in one group, so that populations are approximately equal. According to Anti-NWO's compromise plan, Group 1 will be Canada-USA-Mexico. There is a small problem there. Canada and USA are similar. Mexico is different. If Mexico was like Canada, there would not be any problem.

Still, with Mexico's participation, the problem is small and manageable. The problem would be very big if all American countries were in the same group, as it is foreseen in NWO's disastrous plan. It is much easier having to deal with one country that is somewhat different than having to deal with more than thirty countries that are different. The problem will be gigantic with the implementation of EU's disastrous model, as planned by NWO.

Central and Southern America are relatively homogeneous. Mexico is in North America and USA's southern neighbor. Also new NAFTA (USMCA) exists. So although there is a problem, it would be relatively easy to deal with it, compared to the chaos that would be in American Union with EU's defective model. NWO's thinking is chaotic. This is New World Chaos, not New World Order. They have created a global chaos and Anti-NWO's real elite is trying to fix it.

EU's model is extremely flawed. NWO plans to implement that model in all three other continental Unions American, Asian, African. Eastern Europe's model is expected to be a success and the norm for most other groups. If Eastern Europe does not separate from Western, Eastern Europe's organizational model can not be implemented, tested and prove to be a success. So all groups will be left with EU's extremely faulty model.

Separation between Western and Eastern Europe is absolutely necessary and a red line that can not be crossed. Separation does not have to be alienation. The two groups will determine how close their relations would be. They may choose to have very close relations, so that the two groups will be like almost one group. This is possible with the right agreements.

The right agreements should have the right timing. Perhaps certain agreements would not happen for a few years. Eastern Europe's main goal will be to reach Western's per capita income ASAP (as soon as possible). In this case ASAP could be ten years. When Eastern Europe reaches Western's level in terms of per capita income, certain agreements would be possible.

Of course it is not mandatory for the two groups to have very close relations that will make them almost as one group but it is possible, if they choose so. Generally, all groups are expected to make agreements with other groups based on their interests. For those who support American Union, it is possible for Group 1 of Northern America and Group 2 of Central and Southern America to have very close relations.

Although it is possible, it does not have to be like this. Maybe for example, Group 1 will have very close relations with Group 4 and Group 2 with Group 3. There are several combinations. Also a group is not limited to have close relations with only one group. It can have with more than one, like two, three etc. It is also possible to have informal or formal coalitions of Groups.

In Anti-NWO's compromise plan, there is the option for four informal or formal coalitions. Each will have approximately 2 billion people, with today's population. The four coalitions will be; 1) China + 1 group 2) India + 1 group 3) 4 groups 4) 4 groups. This is an option for the future. What matters presently is that groups should be formed ASAP. Then, they will develop relations among them, based on their interests. They will determine if they benefit from a certain agreement or not.

Also Groups 3 and 4 and generally all groups, can adopt anything they want from other groups. So, if there is a good policy in Group 3, Group 4 can adopt it and vice versa. If there is something good in Group 4, Group 3 can also implement it. The fact that Group 4 will have a much better organizational model and economic plan does not mean that it is banned from following some good things in Group3.