Coalitions’ building blocks
Coalitions' building blocks
As it was explained in previous article, there is no Mercosur in NWO's plan or AntiNWO's final plan. In NWO's ridiculous plan, there is American Union. In AntiNWO's superb plan there is South and Central American Group. But there can be Mercosur in AntiNWO's Plan B which like Plan C is acceptable by AntiNWO. There were several articles regarding plan B.
Final Plan is A Final European Groups 2 Final European Groups Eveness vs flexibility Sum up Plan B Endless alternatives Plan B is a process Example of Plan B AntiNWO's Plan B 3 AntiNWO's Plan B 2 AntiNWO's Plan B 1
These were very important articles. They were not posted for no reason. We recommend to all those interested to read them carefully or read them again. At the time these articles were posted, Coalitions were mentioned but there were no articles about them. There can be Coalitions in Plan B as well. Recently, we posted many articles about Coalitions.
Sets and categories AntiNWO's world structure The tournament will be over A feasible combination A compromising combination Coalitions' supplement Groups' support for AntiNWO Pseudo-Coalitions Process for Coalitions Coalitions' cases Coalitions' formation Coalitions of Groups
In AntiNWO's magnificent plan there are 10+2 Groups; 1) North America 2) South & Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe & ACA 5) Arab Group 6) Northern Subsaharan Africa 7) Southern Subsaharan Africa 8) Southwestern Asia 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia & Oceania 11) India 12) China. ACA is Azerbaijan and Central Asian countries. Instead of North-South, there can be East-West division in Eastern Asia and Subsaharan Africa.
Coalitions are optional. There can be four Coalitions with roughly two billion people each. Groups are the building blocks of the four Coalitions. So the four Coalitions will be; A) four Groups B) four Groups C) China and one Group D) India and one Group. There are many wasy to form the Coalitions, three thousand one hundred and fifty (3,150) combinations.
The building blocks of the Coalitions can be smaller than the Groups in AntiNWO's final Plan. Mercosur has roughly half of the population in South and Central America. That could be one building block for a Coalition. The rest of South and Central America is Andean Community and Parlacen. That could be another building block for a Coalition.
In Western European Group, there are two Subgroups. In Table A of Appendix 15, the North-South division is presented which seems better. But there is also a West-East division shown in Table B of Appendix 15. Eastern European Group has also two SubGroups with two Regions each, as presented in Table B of Appendix 11. These Subgroups in Western and Eastern Europe can also be building blocks for Coalitions.
So we have two building blocks in Souh and Central America, two in Western Europe and two in Eastern Europe. We will give them the names SCA1, SCA2, WE1, WE2, EE1, EE2. Suppose that Northeastern Asia has also two building blocks, NEA1 and NEA2. These eight building blocks can be combined in endless ways to form the four Coalitions (A, B, C, D). We will give only a few alternatives.
- A) SCA1 - SCA2 - WE1 - WE2 - EE1 - EE2 - NEA1 - NEA2
- A) SCA1- SCA2- WE1- WE2 B) EE1- EE2 - NEA1 - NEA2
- A) SCA1- SCA2- NEA1 - NEA2 B) WE1- WE2- EE1- EE2
- A) SCA1- SCA2 B) WE1- WE2 C) EE1- EE2 D) NEA1 - NEA2
- A) SCA1- WE1 B) SCA2- WE2 C) EE1- NEA1 D) EE2- NEA2
In the first example, all eight building blocks are in the same Coalition A. In the next two examples, they are in two Coalitions, A and B. In the last two examples, they are in all four Coalitions. Only in the first example, the building blocks make a complete Coalition with roughly two billion people. In all the other examples, more building blocks will have to be added from other areas of the world in order to have complete Coalitions.
The building blocks will be Groups, different than those in NWO's plan or AntiNWO's final plan. So there will be a different grouping. GROUPS will be the BUILDING BLOCKS of COALITIONS. They will be combined in such a way so that together they have roughly two billion people. This approach has ENORMOUS FLEXIBILITY. But there are also disadvantages.
It would be difficult for decision makers, AntiNWO's active supporters to agree on an option. NWO's grouping is specific. There are four Unions, American, European, African, Asian. A specific grouping is needed for AntiNWO, so that people can compare the two plans, NWO's and AntiNWO's. Until a different grouping is agreed by decision makers, IF it EVER HAPPENS, AntiNWO's PROPOSAL is PLAN A, the 10+2 Groups presented.
There is also a very important factor, the TIME it will take for the AGREEMENT. Suppose that decision makers are able to reach an agreement but this will take them many years, more than a decade. This is too long. If they will reach a agreement for a different grouping, this has to be done relatively soon. AntiNWO's magnificent plan must proceed the soonest possible. If decision makers can't agree on something else soon, PLAN A must PROCEED.
Again EU is a big problem. EU will have to break up in at least three Groups which will become building blocks of Coalitions. Each building block will be a separate group. These building blocks are WE1, WE2 and EE1. They could be in the same or different Coalitions. It is already very hard to break up EU in two parts, Western and Eastern. It will be harder to break EU in at least three parts.
Eventhough there are difficulties, the approach offers enormous flexibility. Difficulties can be overcome. Decision makers, AntiNWO's active supporters, might be able to agree on a different grouping (than Plan A) relatively soon. Also in EU, NWO governments will be replaced with AntiNWO. Instead of breaking up EU in two parts, they can divide that monstrosity into three or more Groups. In that case, the choice will be acceptable by AntiNWO.
Mercosur people should not be fooled by Western European NWO. There is no Mercosur, like there is no ASEAN in NWO's plan. There are specifically four Unions, American, European, African, Asian. But there can be Mercosur in AntiNWO's Plan B. If Mercosur people want to have Mercosur in the grouping, they should be supporters of AntiNWO's spectacular plan and participate in decision making.
Western European NWO gave them something of very little value with the trade deal. It will not last for very long. EU could break into not only two but at least three parts, if decision makers can agree on an option in AntiNWO's Plan B. EU-Mercosur trade deal will not last for very long but whatever is AGREED by ANTINWO's SUPPORTERS could LAST for CENTURIES.