Reconsider Italy 2
Reconsider Italy 2
The ADVANCED AREAS of the world are NORTH AMERICA, WESTERN EUROPE, EASTERN EUROPE, EASTERN PACIFIC (Japan, S. Korea, Australia, New Zealand). The top 50 countries with the highest per capita income (ppp) are concentrated in these areas. China is average in terms of per capita income but very advanced technologically and economically strong because it has the largest economy in purchasing power parity (ppp).
In AntiNWO's Grouping B of Plan 1, North American (376 m), Western European (382 m) and Eastern European (370 m) Group have roughly the same size in terms of population. Scandinavia, Finland, Austria (SFA) are added in Eastern Europe to bring the three populations roughly equal. SFA are next to Eastern Europe. Finland, most of Sweden and the north part of Norway are geographically in Eastern Europe.
According to an opinion that has substantial support, these three should be the poles of three Coalitions. China should be the fourth. There is NO POINT to have ADVANCED AREAS in the SAME COALITION. ADVANCED AREAS should be in DIFFERENT COALITIONS with LESS ADVANCED areas and ASSIST their DEVELOPMENT. Probably Western Europe will be in a Coalition with India because this is what they asked for.
Scandinavia, Finland, Austria (SFA) don't like Russia because it is a big and strong country that is close to them. However, they do not mind being Germany's satelite states. Germany did two World wars, not Russia. USA and Russia (Soviet Union) were the strongest countries in Allied Powers. They stopped Germany and Axis Powers. Otherwise, we would have a Global Dictatorship now, something NWO is trying to attain.
Probably, Scandinavia, Finland, Austria (SFA) do not want to be in the pole of Coalition D with Russia. Italy is much further from Russia, compared to SFA. It does not have as big problem with Russia, as SFA do. Perhaps, Italy would not mind much to be in the pole of Coalition D with Russia. This is presented in Tables C and D or Appendix 58. All Western European countries, except Italy, are the pole of Coalition A (Table C).
Italy and all Eastern European countries (including Russia and Belarus) are the pole of Coalition D (Table D). The populations of the two poles are 393 m (Eastern) and 360 m (Western). These are less equal compared to Grouping B mentioned above but still relatively equal. In the previous article, we expained that its is only fair not to give PCB (Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries) for free to Western Europe but in exchange for Italy.
The basis was Grouping A of Plan 1. The three poles would be the three Groups of Grouping A, North American, Western European, Eastern European. In Grouping A, Azerbaijan - Central Asia (ACA) are added to Eastern Europe, in addition to Cyprus, Georgia, Armenia. Central Asian countries are Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan. With the exception of Kazakhstan, these are not considered advanced countries.
Kazkhstan is around the 50th position in terms of per capita income (ppp). In some rankings, it is in top 50 but not in all. In Grouping A, Mexico is in North American Group with USA - Canada. Mexico is around the 80th position and is not considered an advanced country. According to an opinion that has a lot of support, Grouping B not A, should be the basis to determine the three advanced poles.
Very few people argue that our views are contradictory. In "Away from destroyers" and other articles we have stated that Eastern Europeans should stay as far away from Western, especially Balkans. In "An important decision" and "Evaluate compromises" we explained two compromising alternatives. In one, Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries (PCB) are with Western Europe.
In the other, Scandinavia, Finland, Austria (SFA) are with Eastern Europe (except Russia and Belarus), the pole of Coalition D. In the previous article, we explained why PCB - Slovakia should not be given for free to Western Europe but in exchange for Italy. In this article we argued that PCB - Slovakia AND Italy should be in the pole of Coalition D. Our views are not contradictory. These are all different alternatives that have pros and cons.
We have repeatedly emphasized that the BEST ALTERNATIVE is to have ALL WESTERN EUROPEAN countries TOGETHER, SEPARATELY from ALL EASTERN EUROPEAN countries that will also be TOGETHER. However, Western European NWO has been trying to conquer or control Eastern Europe for almost a thousand years. The worst of Western European countries are the bigger, Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain.
Scandinavia, Finland, Austria (SFA) are not as bad. In EU, they are Germany's satelite states like Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries (PCB) will be if they are with Western Europe. Lebensraum means living space. It is an ideology that supports the expansion of Germany into Eastern Europe. Although not conceived by the Nazis, it was heavily supported and promoted by them. Germans never abandoned that ideology.
They have placed puppet government in PCB. These governments brainwash people. Obviously, they do not tell them that they will be Germany's Lebensraum. They tell them other things that lead to that. They tell them that EU is something wonderful, participation in EU is beneficial, they should have close relations with Western Europe etc. If they are foolish enough to be Germany's Lebensraum, then so be it.
We have tried to make them understand that their best alternative is to be together with the rest of Eastern European countries and away from Western European countries, even if they do not like Russia very much. Obviously, this site does not have the impact of heavy organized propaganda through most mainstream media, financed by Germany and other Western European countries.
Italy does not have so much interest in PCB but in Balkans instead. Hellenes (Greeks) had many colonies in southern Italy from ancient times. When Romans defeated Macedonians (Greeks), the Hellenistic kingdoms became the eastern part of Roman Empire. When Roman Empire was divided, Hellenistic kingdoms gained their independence as Byzantine Empire.
For a long period, contemporary ITALY was in BYZANTINE EMPIRE. All together, it lasted six centuries, from the middle of 6th century till the middle of 12th century. However, Byzantines gradually lost territories, first in the north and then in the middle. Towards the end of the six centuries period, only a small part in the south of Italy remained in Byzantine Empire.
French and Italian Crusaders sacked Constantinople in 1204 AD. Byzantines recaptured Constantinople in 1261 AD. Subsequently they got back a large part of the Empire but some remained under Latin (Italian and French) rule. Since Byzantine Empire was considerably weakened, Ottomans (Turks) seized the opportunity and sacked Constantinople in 1453 AD. During Ottoman period, part of Byzantine Empire remained under Latin (Italian and French) rule.
Byzantine Empire was advanced and prosperous, more than Western Europe in most part of its existence. During Ottoman rule, Balkans became the least advanced area of Europe. It was (Italian and French) effort to conquer Byzantine Empire that led to Ottoman rule. Obviously, Balkan countries will have to accept Italy in Eastern European pole, for that to happen.