Subcoalitions for Coalitions

We mentioned that the three American Groups, as presented in Table A of Appendix 28 or Appendix 30, could be in one Subcoaltion. It happens that the population of the American continent is around one billion which is what the population of a Subcoalition should be. What about the European Groups? We have examined several cases of forming Groups in Europe, in Appendices 26, 29, 18, 20, 11, 14, 15.

In Appendix 26, there are two divisions. In Table A there are two Groups and in Table B three Groups. Appendix 29 has possible Subgroups and Regions, according to the division of Table A (Appendix 26). Appendix 18 has a different division into two Groups and Appendix 20 shows Subgroups and Regions. Total population of Western and Eastern Europe is roughly seven hundred and fifty million or three quarters of a billion.

One option is to have a Subcoalition that is less than one billion. A second option is to add another Group. The Muslim countries that are close to Europe are shown in Appendix 27. In Table A, they are divided into three Groups and in Table B into four Groups. Suppose that the second Group (Turkiye, Saudi Arabia etc) in Table A is added. The total population of the Subcoalition will be one billion and seventy seven million (1.077.064.242) which is a little above one billion.

If the Muslim countries of Appendix 27 are divided into four Groups as in Table B, and one of the Groups is added to the European Groups, the Subcoalition will have a population very close to one billion. If we want to have the Groups of the Subcoalition roughly equal in terms of population, there should be three European Groups, as shown in Table B of Appendix 26. All four Groups will have around a quarter of a billion.

European Groups could be in the same Coalition, only if Western European NWO gives the order to their puppets in Eastern Europe and EU is divided into two, three or four parts. Otherwise, European Groups will not be in the same Subcoalition or Coalition. How would Western European NWO know in how many Groups to divide EU if they will certainly not participate in decision making?

There can be communication between AntiNWO's decision makers and Western European NWO. NWO's supporters will be excluded from decision making regarding AntiNWO's plan (A, B or B2). This really makes sense. They should not be involved at all because they support a different plan, NWO's highly defective. Nevertheless, they can be involved indirectly and some communication can exist between AntiNWO's decision makers and NWO's supporters.

However, Groups in a Subcoalition do not need to have geographical proximity. As it can be seen in Table A of Appendix 28 and Appendix 30, the Latin American countries have a total population of six hundred and forty four million (643.677.285). If these are together in a Subcoalition with the western European Group in Table A of Appendix 26, total population of Subcoalition becomes one billion and twenty five million (1.025.480.398).

So western European Group and Latin countries could be in a Subcoalition. Recently, Western European NWO made EU - Mercosur agreement. As it has been explained, there is no Mercosur in NWO's plan and NO EU in ANTINWO's plan. But the third southern American Group (Table A of Appendix 28 or Appendix 30) is Mercosur plus Bolivia, Peru, Chile. Bolivia will become a full member while the other two, Peru and Chile, are associate members.

Suppose that western European Group is in a Subcoalition only with the third, most southern American Group, Mercosur+. The total population of the two Groups will be seven hundred and seven million (707.962.303). One more Group should be added to have a Subcoalition. If we add the second or middle Muslim Group (Turkiye, Saudi Arabia etc) of Table A - Appendix 27, the sum of the three Groups becomes one billion and thirty three million (1.032.734.506).

There will be countries from South America, Europe and Asia in that Subcoalition. Countries in GROUPS will have CLOSE COOPERATION. That is why GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY is NECESSARY. But RELATIONS in SUBCOALITIONS and COALITIONS will be much LOOSER. SPATIAL PROXIMITY is NOT REQUIRED in Subcoalitions or Coalitions. There can be Groups from different parts of the world.

As it can be seen in Tables A of Appendices 26, 27 and 28, North American Group, western European, eastern European and the most eastern of the Muslim Groups (Iran - Afghanistan - Pakistan) have roughly the same population. So the other three could replace the western European Group in the cases mentioned above and have roughly the same population in the Subcoalition.

Let's replace first western European Group with North American. A Subcoalition could be North American - eastern European - middle Muslim Group in Table A of Appendix 27 (Turkiye, Saudi Arabia etc). If we replace western European with eastern, a possible Subcoalition is eastern European - Latin American countries. Likewise, we can get Subcoalitions with the most eastern Muslim Group (Iran - Afghanistan - Pakistan).

SUBCOALITIONS are OPTIONAL but Coalitions are required in Plans B and B2. However, Subcoalitions could be useful in forming Coalitions. Two Subcoalitions make a Coalition. If we form Subcoalitions and put two of them together, we have a Coalition. But it is not necessary to form Subcoalitions first. In China's and India's Coalition, there can't be Subcoalitions because their population is much above one billion.

China's population is 1.412 million and India's 1.425 million. We have been using 2021 - 2022 DATA so that there is CONSISTENCY in the numbers. In Plan A, one more Group will added in China's and India's Coalition. In Plan B and B2, Groups are smaller. So two small Groups that have a total population of a little less than six hundred million could be added to India's and China's Coalition.

A lot of what was explained regarding Coalitions in Plan A, are still valid for Coalitions in Plan B or B2.

Sets and categories   The tournament will be over   A feasible combination   A compromising combination   Coalitions' supplement   Groups' support for AntiNWO   Pseudo-Coalitions   Process for Coalitions   Coalitions' cases   Coalitions' formation   Coalitions of Groups

We have not examined Subcoalitions from a political angle. We are only trying to get a SUM that is close to ONE BILLION. DECISION MAKERS who will be politicians will EXAMINE GROUPS, SUBCOALITIONS and COALITIONS from a POLITICAL POINT of VIEW. They will need to COOPERATE with DATA ANALYSTS that will get the NUMBERS RIGHT, according to the DIRECTIONS they have.

Here, we are only giving some examples, not a seminar in data analysis. Decision makers will choose grouping, Subcoalitions and Coalitions. The grouping of PLAN A must be taken VERY SERIOUSLY into CONSIDERATION. Obviously, NWO's supporters will NOT PARTICIPATE in the DECISION MAKING DIRECTLY. But they could PARTICIPATE INDIRECTLY by expressing their preferecnces to the decision makers.