AntiNWO's Grouping A

NWO's plan started in the Dark Ages. People that thought NWO's plan had very limited knowledge. Anyone supporting NWO's plan TODAY is an IGNORANT IDIOT. According to NWO's GREAT STUPIDITY, there will be four Unions. A rough estimate of the percentages is; a) European 7,5%, b) American 12,5% c) African 17,5% d) Asian 62,5%. Obviously, ANYONE SUPPORTING such a RIDICULOUS PLAN is a RIDICULOUS PERSON.

In AntiNWO's SUPERIOR PLAN, there are two Groupings, A and B. Grouping B has 16+2=18 Groups. These are is shown in Table A of Appendix 31 (left side). The countries that compose the Groups are in Table A of Appendix 26 (European), Table A of Appendix 27 (Muslim), Table A of Appendix 28 or Appendix 30 (American) and Table C of Appendix 33 (Rest of Asia).

AntiNWO's Grouping A has 10+2=12 Groups; 1) North America A1 2) South & Central America A2 3) Western Europe E1 4) Eastern Europe & ACA E2 5) Arab Group M1 6) Northern Subsaharan Africa S1 7) Southern Subsaharan Africa S2 8) Southwestern Asia M2 9) Eastern Rest of Asia plus Oceania R1 10) Western Rest of Asia R2 11) India I 12) China C.

In both Groupings, Groups are consolidated into four Coalitions. Subcoalitions are optional. Both Groupings have been designed in such way to work well in forming Coalitions. In Grouping B, the four Coalitions are; 1) China + 2 Groups 2) India + 2 Groups 3) 6 Groups 4) 6 Groups. In Grouping A, the four Coalitions are; 1) China + 1 Group 2) India + 1 Group 3) 4 Groups 4) 4 Groups.

In "Acceptable range", and Appendix 31 (left side of Table A and Table B), we demonstrated that Subcoalitions and Coalitions are within an acceptable percentage range. This is 25 ± 2% for Coalitions and 12,5 ± 1% for three-Groups Subcoalitions. In Appendix 36 and Appendix 37, we present the Groups, according to Grouping A, show a few possible combinations for Coalitions and demonstrate that these Coalitions are within an acceptable range.

We should emphasize that in NWO's PLAN, the RANGE is 37,5%. This is how RIDICULOUS NWO's PLAN is and how SILLY NWO's SUPPORTERS are. That GREAT STUPIDITY should be PLACED were it belongs, in the TRASH CAN. Decision makers should choose one of AntiNWO's superb two Groupings (A or B) and arrange the 16+2=18 or the 10+2=12 Groups in four Coalitions and optionally in Subcoalitions.

In Appendix 36, column 1 of Table A has the 10+2=12 Groups of Grouping A, A1, A2, E1, E2, M1, M2, R1, R2, S1, S2, C, I. A Groups are American, E European, M Muslim, S Subsaharan Africa, R Rest of Asia and Oceania. C is China, I india and W world. In column 2 is the population in millions (2022) and in column 3 the population as a percentage of the world's total.

In column 4 are some possible Coalitions. There are six alternatives for forming Coalitions presented in Table A. In Table B four more are shown so that the total is ten. There are three thousand one hundred and forty (3.140) more combinations. In column 5 is the population of the Coalitions and in column 6 the population as percentage of the world's total.

In Tables A and B of Appendix 37 are most of the Groups in detail. In Table A, the American (left side) and European (right side) Groups are shown (A1, A2, E1, E2). We start with American Group A1. As the situation has evolved, ISRAEL may be USA TERRITORY like Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam etc. Even if it is not USA territory, it may be included in USA's Coalition without being in any Group. So we add Israel's population in the Group's.

On the right side of Table A, below Western European Group E1 is Eastern European Group E2. We show separately Eastern Europe (EE) and ACA, Azerbaijan - Central Asian countries (Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan). The populations of EE and ACA are added to have the population of E2. In Eastern Europe (EE), three Asian countries are included, Cyprus, Georgia, Armenia.

Table B of Appendix 37 has Muslim (M) on the left side and Rest of Asia plus Oceania (R) Groups on the right side. M1 has all the Arab countries, except Lebanon and Syria. These are placed in M2. Indicatively, two possible R Groups are shown. An East-West division is used. There could be a North-South division as well. R3 Groups are separately because they may be placed with China. Their population is included in China's (C+) in Tables A and B of Appendix 36.

We do not show Subsaharan Groups. Our rough estimate of the population in Subsaharan Africa is 1,15 billion. In Appendix 36, we assume that each one of the two S Groups has roughly half that population, around 575 million. In Grouping A, there are two S and two R Groups. Their population is larger than in the other Groups. In Grouping B, there are four S and four R Groups. Their population is smaller than in the rest of the Groups.

Can there be three S and three R Groups? Yes, but this would make forming Coalitions with roughly 25% of the world's population difficult. In both AntiNWO's Groupings (A and B), Groups do not have equal population because this is not possible. What matters is that in both Groupings, Coalitions' populations are within an acceptable range around 25% which is one fourth (1/4) of the world's.

As it can be seen in Table A of Appendix 36, almost all the Coalitions are withtin the 25 ± 2%. A1-A2-R2-S2 (27,09%) and A1-A2-S1-S2 (27,37%) are within 25 ± 2,5% range while E1-E2-M1-M2 (22,27%) is within 25 ± 3% range. It is not necessary to have ± 2% range. It can be ± 2,5% or ± 3%. Compared to NWO's 37,5% range, even ±5% is very very small. Nevertheless, the smaller the range, the more equal the Coalitions will be in terms of population.

Obviously, there can be Subcoalitions, which are optional. There are several examples, A1-A2, E2-R1, E1-E2, M1-M2, S1-S2, R1-R2, E1-M1, E2-M1, E2-M2, M1-S1 etc. There can be no Subcoalitions in China's and India's Group because there is only one more Group added in Grouping A. But the other two Coalitions have four Groups. So there could be TWO SUBCOALITIONS with TWO GROUPS each. But it is NOT NECESSARY to have SUBCOALITIONS.

It is a TOTAL WASTE of TIME to even CONSIDER NWO's ridiculous plan. That great stupidity will certainly end up in the garbage can. One of AntiNWO's two Groupings will eventually be chosen. Based on the chosen grouping, Coalitions will be formed. If it is absolutely certain that one of AntiNWO's groupings will be chosen, there is only HARM DONE by even still considering NWO's ridiculous plan.